Index: r200_swtcl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/mesa/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_swtcl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.23 r200_swtcl.c
--- r200_swtcl.c	17 Feb 2005 14:12:50 -0000	1.23
+++ r200_swtcl.c	9 Mar 2005 23:07:17 -0000
@@ -219,6 +219,12 @@
 {
    r200ContextPtr rmesa = R200_CONTEXT( ctx );
    TNLcontext *tnl = TNL_CONTEXT(ctx);
+   
+   /* XXX we must ensure we don't mess with _tnl_need_projected_coords when in
+    * a raster fallback. However, this may not be correct I believe, I think this
+    * code may be triggered when we are just transitioning to raster fallback, and
+    * are not yet there? */
+   if (rmesa->Fallback) return;
 
    GLuint vte = rmesa->hw.vte.cmd[VTE_SE_VTE_CNTL];
    GLuint vap = rmesa->hw.vap.cmd[VAP_SE_VAP_CNTL];
@@ -678,7 +684,8 @@
 	 R200_FIREVERTICES( rmesa );
 	 TCL_FALLBACK( ctx, R200_TCL_FALLBACK_RASTER, GL_TRUE );
 	 _swsetup_Wakeup( ctx );
-	 _tnl_need_projected_coords( ctx, GL_TRUE );
+	 /* xxx this won't do anything as it's called within _swsetup_Wakeup anyway */
+/*	 _tnl_need_projected_coords( ctx, GL_TRUE ); */
 	 rmesa->swtcl.RenderIndex = ~0;
          if (R200_DEBUG & DEBUG_FALLBACKS) {
             fprintf(stderr, "R200 begin rasterization fallback: 0x%x %s\n",