Summary: | [CI][SHARDS] igt@perf_pmu@busy-idle-check-all-vcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(val[i]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(0.0f) && (double)(val[i]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(0.0f) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Martin Peres <martin.peres> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | XOrg git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | SNB | i915 features: | Perf/PMU |
Description
Martin Peres
2019-05-27 10:37:13 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * SNB: igt@perf_pmu@busy-idle-check-all-vcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(val[i]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(0.0f) && (double)(val[i]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(0.0f) - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13098/shard-snb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-idle-check-all-vcs0.html In a loop for 12 hours on snb, not a single failure. I did suspect it may have been fallout from the engine map overhaul, but that would have been consistent. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.