|Summary:||Clean up and update Lithuanian keyboard layouts|
|Product:||xkeyboard-config||Reporter:||Rimas Kudelis <rq>|
|Status:||RESOLVED FIXED||QA Contact:|
|i915 platform:||i915 features:|
Output of git diff -w (for reference only, no whitespace changes)
git diff (patch with whitespace changes, please commit this one)
Description Rimas Kudelis 2010-09-01 04:25:38 UTC
Created attachment 38353 [details] Output of git diff -w (for reference only, no whitespace changes) I cleaned up symbols/lt and made a few changes to most of the layouts. I'd like to see this commited. Detailed explanation of what I did follows. The cleanup I did: * moved/changed the comments here and there, so that they're similar for all keymaps * aligned all layout descriptions to actually have nice columns * also replaced tabs with spaces * moved around definitions of certain keys to order them by actual order on keyboard * moved includes to the top of each layout. * replaced definitions of certain keys with includes The changes: * replaced definitions of certain keys with includes * added endash to the 3rd level of the <AE11> in lt, lt(us), and lt(ibm) * added acute to the 3rd level of <TLDE> in lt, lt(us), and lt(ibm) * added include "eurosign(e)" to lt I discussed the changes on local linux users mailing list, and got positive feedback about them.
Comment 1 Rimas Kudelis 2010-09-01 04:26:50 UTC
Created attachment 38354 [details] [review] git diff (patch with whitespace changes, please commit this one)
Comment 2 Rimas Kudelis 2010-09-01 04:57:16 UTC
I still have two concerns though: 1) I would actually be willing to remove lt(ibm) at all. The standard it implements was made deprecated by lt(std) 10 years ago, so I doubt that layout has many users. On the other hand, our implementation seems to be mure advanced than the standard, and actually is usable, so it's possible that it has a few users who would miss it. 2) if I get it right, nbsp(level3) should add no-break space to both 3rd and 4th levels. But in effect, at least when toggling appropriate radio buttons in Gnome, both of these options only echo non-breaking space in the third level. I think this is a bug, in nbsp(level3), right?
Comment 3 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2010-09-01 14:04:56 UTC