Bug 36214

Summary:	NoUpdateProcessList only matches 32-bit firefox
Product:	PackageKit	Reporter:	Oliver Henshaw <oliver.henshaw>
Component:	General	Assignee:	Richard Hughes <richard>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	medium	CC:	patrickdakon1
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux (All)
Whiteboard:
i915 platform:		i915 features:

Description Oliver Henshaw 2011-04-13 10:00:06 UTC

/etc/PackageKit/PackageKit.conf has the line

NoUpdateProcessList=/usr/lib/*/firefox

but

$ ls /usr/lib/*/firefox
ls: cannot access /usr/lib/*/firefox: No such file or directory
$ ls /usr/lib64/*/firefox
/usr/lib64/firefox-3.6/firefox

Noticed on PackageKit-0.6.6-3.fc13.x86_64 but the file is unchanged in current git, http://gitorious.org/packagekit/packagekit/blobs/master/etc/PackageKit.conf.in


PS. I guess this check is still needed - I thought I'd heard somewhere that firefox behaves better than it used to when being updated while running. I see the firefox doesn't put the most minor part of the version number in the library path anyomre, which probably helps, but bug #489306 is still open.

Comment 1 Oliver Henshaw 2011-04-13 10:02:46 UTC

Forgot I wasn't in RH bugzilla - that's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489306 and upstream bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526212

Comment 2 Richard Hughes 2011-05-17 04:39:52 UTC

(In reply to comment #0)
> I see firefox doesn't put the most minor part of the version number in the
> library path anyomre...

That's good news indeed.

Richard.

Comment 3 Richard Hughes 2011-05-23 01:50:47 UTC

Fixed in the examples, thanks.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.