| Summary: | Cannot render a particular PDF document | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | poppler | Reporter: | Francesco Turco <fturco> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | poppler-bugs <poppler-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | andyrtr |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
| OS: | Linux (All) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
| Attachments: | debug info for pdftocairo | ||
|
Description
Francesco Turco
2016-08-02 09:57:17 UTC
Created attachment 125479 [details]
debug info for pdftocairo
Command output for:
LD_DEBUG=libs pdftocairo -png linux.pdf -singlefile > pdftocairo.log 2>&1
I tried rebuilding poppler-0.42.0 with the following options: 1) --enable-libopenjpeg=openjpeg1: pdftocairo produces warnings and a broken PNG file 2) --enable-libopenjpeg=openjpeg2: pdftocairo produces a good PNG file with no warnings at all 3) --enable-libopenjpeg=auto: it selects version 1; pdftocairo produces warnings and a broken PNG file So use openjpeg2 ? The problem could afflict other users besides me, so I guess that configure option should be used by Arch/Parabola by default. So I filed the following bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50237 Arch usually won't switch to use openjpeg2 until upstream recommends it as the preferred/recommended and better tested library. I see Fedora and Debian using openjpeg2 in their latest branches. Is openjpeg2 now recommended by the poppler devs? Some answer to the question on the mailing list would be nice: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2016-July/011899.html If this is a bug in libopenjpeg(1) I doubt it will ever get fixed. The Arch Linux bug has now been marked as fixed. (In reply to a.radke from comment #5) > Arch usually won't switch to use openjpeg2 until upstream recommends it as > the preferred/recommended and better tested library. I see Fedora and Debian > using openjpeg2 in their latest branches. > > Is openjpeg2 now recommended by the poppler devs? Some answer to the > question on the mailing list would be nice: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2016-July/011899.html Yes, agreed, it would be nice if somebody answered my emails -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issues/359. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.