Bug 1109 - ati rage mobility on Dell Inspiron 7500 fails to display anything
Summary: ati rage mobility on Dell Inspiron 7500 fails to display anything
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/mach64 (show other bugs)
Version: git
Hardware: x86 (IA32) All
: high normal
Assignee: Xorg Project Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 398 1690 2159
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-08-17 06:28 UTC by Thomas J. Baker
Modified: 2007-10-29 10:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
Log file when system displays nothing (39.35 KB, text/plain)
2004-08-17 06:29 UTC, Thomas J. Baker
no flags Details
Log when "vga=792" is added to kernel command line so that display works (45.44 KB, text/plain)
2004-08-17 06:29 UTC, Thomas J. Baker
no flags Details
log with 903 when nothing is displayed (39.35 KB, text/plain)
2004-08-29 15:53 UTC, Thomas J. Baker
no flags Details
log with 903 and kernel cmdline arg vga=792 (39.45 KB, text/plain)
2004-08-29 15:54 UTC, Thomas J. Baker
no flags Details
patch from the freebsd site listed above (3.96 KB, patch)
2005-04-18 08:23 UTC, Thomas J. Baker
mharris: 6.8-branch?
Details | Splinter Review

Description Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-17 06:28:20 UTC
The xserver starts without errors but nothing is displayed. I have to add the
kernel boot option "vga=792" to get it to work correctly.

lspci -vv:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x
(rev 64) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
        Subsystem: Dell: Unknown device 009e
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 66 (2000ns min), Cache Line Size 08
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
        Region 0: Memory at fd000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Region 1: I/O ports at 2000 [size=256]
        Region 2: Memory at fc100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [50] AGP version 1.0
                Status: RQ=256 Iso- ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64- HTrans-
64bit- FW- AGP3- Rate=x1,x2
                Command: RQ=1 ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA- AGP- GART64- 64bit- FW- Rate=<none>
        Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Comment 1 Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-17 06:29:13 UTC
Created attachment 659 [details]
Log file when system displays nothing
Comment 2 Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-17 06:29:46 UTC
Created attachment 660 [details]
Log when "vga=792" is added to kernel command line so that display works
Comment 3 Mike A. Harris 2004-08-27 11:16:55 UTC
Adding to release blocker for consideration for 6.8.0 release.
Comment 4 Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-29 15:52:50 UTC
With the 6.7.99.903 release, it still doesn't work.
Comment 5 Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-29 15:53:57 UTC
Created attachment 766 [details]
log with 903 when nothing is displayed
Comment 6 Thomas J. Baker 2004-08-29 15:54:37 UTC
Created attachment 767 [details]
log with 903 and kernel cmdline arg vga=792
Comment 7 Kevin E. Martin 2004-08-30 18:45:15 UTC
This was discussed on today's release wranglers call.  The decision was that
since it is so late in the release process and we do not have access to the
hardware, we won't have time fix this problem in this release; however, since
there is a workaround, we want to document it so that anyone else experiencing
this problem will know what to do.

Moving this to the release notes bug 999 and will keep it open so that it can be
investigated after the release.
Comment 8 Daniel Stone 2004-11-22 06:29:17 UTC
at least, I'm pretty sure this is the problem

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1881 ***
Comment 9 Juilan Elischer 2005-01-30 00:18:30 UTC
This affects at least FreeBSD and OpenBSD as well.
the workaround obviously doen't work for them (at least not directly)
If this has been fixed soemwhere then add a link to the fixed file in CVS.

It is not a duplicate of 1881 as that is for the radeon friver and this is the
ati driver.
Comment 10 Daniel Stone 2005-02-22 22:24:11 UTC
Good point, my bad.
Comment 11 Dejan Lesjak 2005-03-26 08:02:20 UTC
This has been fixed by patch from Marc Aurele La France in this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/xfree86@xfree86.org/msg18078.html
and commited to XFree86:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cvs-commit@xfree86.org/msg04183.html
It has also been confirmed that the patch fixes Xorg. FreeBSD ports include this 
patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/files/patch-
atimobility
Comment 12 Mike A. Harris 2005-04-11 04:01:14 UTC
If someone attaches the actual patch to bugzilla as a file attachment,
we can nominate it for inclusion in 6.8.3.
Comment 13 Thomas J. Baker 2005-04-18 08:23:09 UTC
Created attachment 2446 [details] [review]
patch from the freebsd site listed above

Since I'd like to see this fixed, I've attached the patch as downloaded from
the freebsd site. It seems to apply cleanly and I'm currently rebuilding the
Fedora 6.8.2-23 RPM to see if it works on my laptop.
Comment 14 Thomas J. Baker 2005-04-19 15:54:15 UTC
My rebuilt RPMs with the patch applied seem to work fine. I no longer have to
use vga=792 to get the LCD to display X.
Comment 15 Thomas J. Baker 2005-04-22 07:44:59 UTC
So is there any chance of this fix getting into 6.8.3?
Comment 16 Mike A. Harris 2005-04-22 08:24:03 UTC
I've reviewed the patch, and I don't see anything obviously bad about it.
There seems to be enough evidence pointed to in this bug report that it
fixes the problem, so I'm nominating it for 6.8.3.

Comment 17 Daniel Stone 2005-08-28 05:52:43 UTC
do we have this in HEAD?  it's marked as blocking 6.9/7.0.
Comment 18 Adam Jackson 2005-08-28 11:10:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> do we have this in HEAD?  it's marked as blocking 6.9/7.0.

we do now.  fixed in HEAD.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.