Bug 18928 - RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
Summary: RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: PackageKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Richard Hughes
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-12-07 11:29 UTC by Nicolas Mailhot
Modified: 2018-08-21 15:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-07 11:29:36 UTC
The best way for a user to select a font is to show it to him.

For this reason font sites commonly provide bitmap preview images or so-called specimen files (typically in PDF form) that showcase the font capabilities.
http://gonzo.uni-weimar.de/~gerner/fonts/YanoneKaffeesatz.pdf
http://www.ascendercorp.com/pdf/Droid_fonts.pdf

Packagekit should do the same.

The image should be a pangram
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pangrams

in the main unicode blocks the font supports

The specimen may include unicode coverage info, glyph table, etc

For more info ask on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com
Comment 1 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-07 11:53:48 UTC
Thinking about it some more a complete glyph table is probably too much, and a bitmap preview won't work too well depending on the target system dpi, to the best thing is probably a pdf with the embedded glyphs necessary for a few pangrams, and a list of unicode blocks/scripts with complete coverage

Eugeniy Meshcheryakov has a written a little tool to generate complete PDF glyphs tables with embedded fonts, it can probably serve as inspiration to do the same for pangrams

http://sourceforge.net/projects/fntsample
Comment 2 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 13:29:13 UTC
Sounds like fun.  I can do everything up to generating the PDF.  What should we do with it then?
Comment 3 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-09 13:30:52 UTC
Thinking about it a bit more, PDF with embedded glyphs would probably run afoul of no-embedding restrictions in some font licenses (including GPL fonts), so a SVG pangram preview is probably a better solution.
Comment 4 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-09 13:42:26 UTC
I think that if you can generate the preview stuff, Richard just has to define where to install it on the filesystem and how to name it so packagekit can scrape it and display it in its GUI (like it does for desktop icons for example)
Comment 5 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 13:50:22 UTC
If there's any embedding restrictions, the font is useless in Fedora.  That happens every time you print anything.

We never embed full fonts though.  Neither do we embed OpenType tables, etc.  We subset, and the subset is as useful as the outlines ending up in a SVG.  I don't think there's any problem there.
Comment 6 Richard Hughes 2008-12-10 01:49:44 UTC
Can we dump the file in /usr/share/fonts/preview/? I would prefer a svg from a programming point of view.
Comment 7 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-10 15:25:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can we dump the file in /usr/share/fonts/preview/? I would prefer a svg from a
> programming point of view.

We can.  Actually it occurred to me that I need to fix more infrastructure for this to work...  Namely, this one:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237
Comment 8 Richard Hughes 2018-08-21 15:53:04 UTC
We moved the upstream bugtracker to GitHub a long time ago. If this issue still affects you please re-create the issue here: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/issues
 
Sorry for the impersonal message, and fingers crossed your issue no longer happens. Thanks.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.