Created attachment 35335 [details] [review] Xorg -configure log We are running a Fedora 9 for PPC on our Freescale 8641D based board. We are trying an ATI Technologies Inc Radeon E2400 rev 0 on the PCIe. The Xorg server never completes its initialization and is failing with the following output: # Xorg -configure ... Backtrace: 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x94) [0x10082e34] 1: [0x100364] 2: [0x24000482] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONGetConnectorInfoFromBIOS+0x8c) [0xe5f759c] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONSetupConnectors+0xbc8) [0xe60aa88] 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so [0xe5e6ed0] 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONPreInit+0xd4c) [0xe5e86ac] 7: X(InitOutput+0xa00) [0x10066140] 8: X(main+0x288) [0x10022178] 9: /lib/libc.so.6 [0xfe1d8f0] 10: /lib/libc.so.6 [0xfe1dab0] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting See attached the complete log. Any idea would be very helpful...
This should be fixed in a newer version of the ddx (xf86-video-ati). Please try 6.12.x, 6.13.0 or git master.
On Fedora, we have xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.8.0-12.fc9.ppc package: [root@emitest2 ~]# yum info xorg-x11-drv-ati Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages Name : xorg-x11-drv-ati Arch : ppc Version : 6.8.0 Release : 12.fc9 Size : 1.0 M Repo : installed Summary : Xorg X11 ati video driver URL : http://www.x.org License : MIT Description: X.Org X11 ati video driver. My guess is that it is a re-packaging of xf86-video-ati. Is it right ? If yes, I will try to upgrade it.
(In reply to comment #2) > My guess is that it is a re-packaging of xf86-video-ati. > Is it right ? > > If yes, I will try to upgrade it. Yes.
Created attachment 35914 [details] [review] Xorg log en radeon 6.13.0
As recommanded, I recompiled the 6.13.0 and test it on my 8641D (ppc freescale) board. The server is now looping in an infinite way in the vbios related code of the radeon driver. Hereafter, the end of the Xorg log: (II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 1000 (II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel Clock: 400000 (II) RADEON(0): Reference Clock: 27000 (II) RADEON(0): Default Engine Clock: 450000 (II) RADEON(0): Default Memory Clock: 500000 (II) RADEON(0): Calling ASIC Init (refer to the complete log attached) And gdb give me: 0x0e6626a4 in IndirectInputOutput (pParserTempData=0xbfdd5118) at AtomBios/CD_Operations.c:237 237 } else pParserTempData->IndirectIOTablePointer+=IndirectIOParserCommands[*pParserTempData->IndirectIOTablePointer].csize; (gdb) bt #0 0x0e6626a4 in IndirectInputOutput (pParserTempData=0xbfdd5118) at AtomBios/CD_Operations.c:237 #1 0x0e663210 in PutDataRegister (pParserTempData=0xbfdd5118) at AtomBios/CD_Operations.c:257 #2 0x0e66149c in ProcessMove (pParserTempData=0xbfdd5118) at AtomBios/CD_Operations.c:503 #3 0x0e663560 in ParseTable (pDeviceData=0xbfdd5198, IndexInMasterTable=<value optimized out>) at AtomBios/Decoder.c:235 #4 0x0e669828 in ParseTableWrapper (pspace=<value optimized out>, index=<value optimized out>, handle=<value optimized out>, BIOSBase=<value optimized out>, msg_return=<value optimized out>) at radeon_atomwrapper.c:51 #5 0x0e6664b0 in rhdAtomExec (handle=0x102678c8, unused=<value optimized out>, data=<value optimized out>) at radeon_atombios.c:2655 #6 0x0e666680 in RHDAtomBiosFunc (scrnIndex=0, handle=<value optimized out>, id=<value optimized out>, data=0xbfdd5208) at radeon_atombios.c:2697 #7 0x0e666e08 in rhdAtomASICInit (handle=0x102678c8) at radeon_atombios.c:518 #8 0x0e62f7f8 in RADEONGetBIOSInfo (pScrn=0x10262f40, pInt10=<value optimized out>) at radeon_bios.c:474 #9 0x0e61dff4 in RADEONPreInit (pScrn=0x10262f40, flags=<value optimized out>) at radeon_driver.c:2787 #10 0x10066140 in InitOutput () ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- #11 0x10022178 in main () Is there a way to emulate or workaround the VBIOS code under PPC ? I see some comment about Apple G5 with OpenFirmware running some ATI graphics but here we do not have any OF.
I suspect there must have been some endian breakage in the atom parser as very few people use the driver on non-x86 platforms. It did work at one time. The driver relies on the parser to initialize the asic and set the modes. I would suggest bisecting between 6.12.0 and 6.13.0
Mass closure: This bug has been untouched for more than six years, and is not obviously still valid. Please reopen this bug or file a new report if you continue to experience issues with current releases.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.