Bug 36823 - Firmware Bug: ACPI No _BCQ method
Summary: Firmware Bug: ACPI No _BCQ method
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/Radeon (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: xf86-video-ati maintainers
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-03 23:51 UTC by Cedric Sodhi
Modified: 2012-08-10 17:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
dmesg (61.51 KB, text/plain)
2011-05-03 23:54 UTC, Cedric Sodhi
no flags Details
possible fix (2.20 KB, patch)
2011-05-05 22:38 UTC, Alex Deucher
no flags Details | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Cedric Sodhi 2011-05-03 23:51:45 UTC
Radeon Device aa68 Graphics card (Cedar). Used in hybrid graphics with Intel i915 vgaswitcheroo, hence both are compiled in (Bug #36783 [1]) and KMS enabled (without KMS the problem usually not occurs). On boot, the screen tunrs of the backlight by itsself and has to be turned on manually[2]. A message in dmesg that is likely to be related says

Firmware Bug: ACPI: No _BCQ method

THe log has several errors related to the radeon. Kernel is 39-rc5.

[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36783
[2] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-874961.html
Comment 1 Cedric Sodhi 2011-05-03 23:54:59 UTC
Created attachment 46307 [details]
dmesg
Comment 2 Alex Deucher 2011-05-05 22:38:58 UTC
Created attachment 46384 [details] [review]
possible fix

Does this kernel patch help?
Comment 3 Cedric Sodhi 2011-05-06 11:06:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=46384) [details]
> possible fix
> 
> Does this kernel patch help?

No (tried on next-20110506).
Comment 4 Alex Deucher 2011-10-05 06:23:17 UTC
This looks like a duplicate of bug 41306.
Comment 5 Cedric Sodhi 2011-10-05 10:45:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> This looks like a duplicate of bug 41306.

Negative. It is related in thus far as that this problem (as I've mentioned in Bug #41306) constitutes the part where the backlight initially goes off. However, it's is not assumed, nor it is likely, that it is directly related to the problem that the backlight cannot be brought back on (which is, what the other bug concerns).

Prior to the 3 series there have been times when the backlight would go off (with the error mentioned above) but could be brought back on nonetheless.

As also mentioned in the other bug, these scenarios could, however, not be reproduced for unknown reasons.

After all this bug should stay open and a priori assumed to be uncorrelated.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.