Created attachment 51180 [details] Logs from A the sender of the file transfer Steps to reproduce: - open a file transfer on A for B - on B do not accept/decline it - cancel the file transfer on A ---> B should receive a notification that the file transfer has been canceled Looking at the tp-salut logs (version 0.4) on A we do call salut-file-transfer-channel.c:salut_file_transfer_channel_do_close which does call tp_svc_channel_emit_closed (self). On B, we never receive any notification about that. As far as I understood from http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/spec/Channel_Type_File_Transfer.html#Signal:FileTransferStateChanged A has to only call 'Close' on the channel which we do in Sugar when a file transfer is canceled like described in the scenario from above.
Created attachment 51181 [details] Logs from B the receiver of the file transfer
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/telepathy/telepathy-salut/issues/31.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.