Bug 13067 - Radeon driver doesn't respect virtual desktop size
Summary: Radeon driver doesn't respect virtual desktop size
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/Radeon (show other bugs)
Version: 7.3 (2007.09)
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: xf86-video-ati maintainers
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-02 17:01 UTC by Andreas Pakulat
Modified: 2010-10-19 15:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
xorg.conf for 3080x1050 desktop (4.50 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-02 17:02 UTC, Andreas Pakulat
no flags Details
xorg.log for trying a 3080x1050 desktop (51.20 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-02 17:03 UTC, Andreas Pakulat
no flags Details

Description Andreas Pakulat 2007-11-02 17:01:13 UTC
Using XRandR 1.2 with the latest git version (last log entry is from Sun Oct 28th 21:10) of the radeon driver I can't get a virtual desktop of 3080x1050.

I have a Laptop with a widescreen display running on 1680x1050 and a CRT which can run 1600x1200 at max. With Xorg 7.2 and Xinerama I've used a 1400x1050 resolution on the CRT, but this doesn't work anymore with XRandR.

When using the attached xorg.conf I get the xrandr output that the minimum size is 320x200, current size is 3360x1050 and the maximum is 3080x1050. And the display is broken too, as part of my xterm is cloned on the outer right of the right display.

I can force the CRT to run at 1680x1050 with an according modeline, however that distorts all fonts and stretches them vertically.

I'll also attach the Xorg.log
Comment 1 Andreas Pakulat 2007-11-02 17:02:48 UTC
Created attachment 12325 [details]
xorg.conf for 3080x1050 desktop
Comment 2 Andreas Pakulat 2007-11-02 17:03:29 UTC
Created attachment 12327 [details]
xorg.log for trying a 3080x1050 desktop
Comment 3 Alexander Goomenyuk 2007-11-30 13:47:52 UTC
I had the similar problem.

I had got wxsga+ monitor (22'). And I tried to use 1680x1050 mode. But I always got 1400x1050 resolution. Until I set UseFBDev. After that resolution is fine.
Comment 4 Alex Deucher 2007-11-30 13:56:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I had the similar problem.
> 
> I had got wxsga+ monitor (22'). And I tried to use 1680x1050 mode. But I always
> got 1400x1050 resolution. Until I set UseFBDev. After that resolution is fine.
> 

UseFBDev is no longer a valid option so you must be using an old version of the driver.
Comment 5 Alex Deucher 2007-11-30 14:03:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Using XRandR 1.2 with the latest git version (last log entry is from Sun Oct
> 28th 21:10) of the radeon driver I can't get a virtual desktop of 3080x1050.
> 
> I have a Laptop with a widescreen display running on 1680x1050 and a CRT which
> can run 1600x1200 at max. With Xorg 7.2 and Xinerama I've used a 1400x1050
> resolution on the CRT, but this doesn't work anymore with XRandR.

Does it work ok if you turn off the CRT and them use xrandr to set up dualhead?
xrandr --output VGA-0 --off
xrandr --output VGA-0 --mode 1400x1050_85.00
xrandr --output VGA-0 --left-of LVDS
Comment 6 Andreas Pakulat 2007-11-30 17:47:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Using XRandR 1.2 with the latest git version (last log entry is from Sun Oct
> > 28th 21:10) of the radeon driver I can't get a virtual desktop of 3080x1050.
> > 
> > I have a Laptop with a widescreen display running on 1680x1050 and a CRT which
> > can run 1600x1200 at max. With Xorg 7.2 and Xinerama I've used a 1400x1050
> > resolution on the CRT, but this doesn't work anymore with XRandR.
> 
> Does it work ok if you turn off the CRT and them use xrandr to set up dualhead?
> xrandr --output VGA-0 --off
> xrandr --output VGA-0 --mode 1400x1050_85.00
> xrandr --output VGA-0 --left-of LVDS

See bug: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13068
can't use that method, though from the "looks" on the VGA it seems to work, i.e. the text seems to have the same proportion on both screens.
Comment 7 Alex Deucher 2008-12-03 00:41:21 UTC
Is this still an issue with a newer driver (6.9.0 or newer)?
Comment 8 Alex Deucher 2010-10-19 15:42:42 UTC
closing due to lack of feedback.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.