Same as bug#14828, but for the Connection. Other things that should perhaps go in the struct before its layout is made public include: * self-handle: space is reserved, but this can't be made reliable until we finalize Renaming * protocol? (derivable from the object-path) * list of channels? * some sort of handle-repository object(s)? None of the other Connection interfaces seem like obvious candidates for special treatment, whereas for Channel, I think we should treat Group specially.
Taking a cue from the new Gtk policy, I've decided not to expose any public struct members - I've been adding function-based accessors instead. Fixed in darcs, will be in 0.7.12.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.