Bug 70476 - XSync idletime alarms may not trigger for low thresholds
Summary: XSync idletime alarms may not trigger for low thresholds
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Server/General (show other bugs)
Version: git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Xorg Project Team
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-10-15 06:31 UTC by Peter Hutterer
Modified: 2014-08-05 22:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:

Attachments

Description Peter Hutterer 2013-10-15 06:31:20 UTC 
Looks like Bug 59644 at first, but is different. A client requesting a positive transition alarm on IDLETIME for a low threshold may miss out on those. The sampling of the server is not good enough.

e.g. a client may request a positive transition on a 1ms threshold from idletime. The IdleTimeBlockHandler may recognise this and schedule for a wakeup, but the IdleTimeWakeupHandler re-queries the idletime and uses that value for triggering the alarms. If one ms or more have passed between Block and WakeupHandler, the alarm isn't triggered.

Since the delay between block and wakeup handler time is random and depends on system load, this makes clients miss random events.
Comment 1 Peter Hutterer 2013-10-17 04:18:21 UTC 
Patch series starting here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-October/038198.html
Comment 2 Peter Hutterer 2014-08-05 22:52:53 UTC 
Patches leading up to and including:

commit 06b87aa528d7a739ba20101a1f83b1a428691a01
Author: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date:   Wed Oct 16 10:08:46 2013 +1000

    sync: if the idle time was reset, force alarms to trigger (#70476)

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.