While "Building xcb module component xcb..." if fails with: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../tests -I../src -no-cpp-precomp -I/usr/include/openssl -I/sw/ include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/ include -Wall -Werror -I../../src -pipe -fPIC -O0 -MT check_all.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/check_all.Tpo" - c -o check_all.o ../../tests/check_all.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/check_all.Tpo" ".deps/check_all.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/check_all.Tpo"; exit 1; fi cc1: warnings being treated as errors ../../tests/check_all.c: In function ‘main’: ../../tests/check_all.c:15: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘srunner_set_xml’ make[4]: *** [check_all.o] Error 1 if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../tests -I../src -no-cpp-precomp -I/usr/include/openssl -I/sw/ include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/ include -Wall -Werror -I../../src -pipe -fPIC -O0 -MT check_public.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ check_public.Tpo" -c -o check_public.o ../../tests/check_public.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/check_public.Tpo" ".deps/check_public.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/check_public.Tpo"; exit 1; fi ../../tests/check_public.c:19:64: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c: In function ‘parse_display_pass’: ../../tests/check_public.c:19: error: ‘fail_unless’ undeclared (first use in this function) ../../tests/check_public.c:19: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../tests/check_public.c:19: error: for each function it appears in.) ../../tests/check_public.c:20:130: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 5 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:21:130: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 5 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:22:125: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 5 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:28:75: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:29:141: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 5 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:30:141: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 5 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:43:65: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c: In function ‘parse_display_fail’: ../../tests/check_public.c:43: error: ‘fail_unless’ undeclared (first use in this function) ../../tests/check_public.c:44:91: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:45:92: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:46:89: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:52:76: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:53:91: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ../../tests/check_public.c:54:92: error: macro "fail_unless" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 make[4]: *** [check_public.o] Error 1 make[4]: Target `check_all' not remade because of errors. make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [distcheck] Error 2 There is also a warning: In file included from /usr/X11R7/include/X11/Xdmcp.h:22, from ../../src/xcb_auth.c:41: /usr/X11R7/include/X11/Xmd.h:155: warning: ISO C90 does not support ‘long long’
I think you have an ancient version of check, from before August 2004. If so, you should either upgrade or remove it. If that's not the problem, please re-open this bug.
(In reply to comment #1) > I think you have an ancient version of check, from before August 2004. If so, > you should either upgrade or remove it. If that's not the problem, please > re-open this bug. What is "check?" I got xcb moduless and moree via git, so everything inside xcb should have been up-to-date ...
It's a unit-testing framework. See http://check.sourceforge.net/. It's optional for building XCB: you only need it if you want to run the unit tests. I'm re-opening this bug because we've just discovered that the dependency that configure declares on check isn't sufficient to get a version that actually works. We're fixing this by switching to using pkg-config, which is supported only on check 0.9.4 or newer. Older versions might also work, but we don't care since it's an optional dependency.
I believe this is fixed in current XCB git. You should have no problems compiling, even with whatever version of check you currently have installed. Also, I meant to say this earlier: I apologize for taking so long to respond to your report. I didn't see it until I went searching for XCB-related bugs, a month after you originally submitted it. I've taken some steps to make sure I notice such reports in the future. In hindsight, I also apologize for marking it "invalid" on the first try. :-/
(In reply to comment #3) > It's a unit-testing framework. See http://check.sourceforge.net/. It's optional > for building XCB: you only need it if you want to run the unit tests. > I now remember! I've seen it in the Wiki and installed version 0.8.4, the version that Fink provides for Mac OS X.
(In reply to comment #4) > I believe this is fixed in current XCB git. You should have no problems > compiling, even with whatever version of check you currently have installed. The old error does not re-appear in 0.9.93 after having updated. Configure finds no check >= 0.94. The new errors introduced (I think doxygen wasn't installed the last times) are (excerpts): Making all in doc make[1]: Entering directory `/Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/doc' /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/bigreq.c:108: Warning: end of file while inside a group /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/composite.c:752: Warning: end of file while inside a group ... /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/damage.h:25: Warning: Member xcb_damage_id (variable) of group XCB_Damage_API is not documented. sh: line 1: dot: command not found Problems running dot. Check your installation! sh: line 1: dot: command not found Problems running dot. Check your installation! /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/dpms.h:20: Warning: Member XCB_DPMS_MAJOR_VERSION (define) of group XCB_DPMS_API is not documented. ... /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/bigreq.h:6: Warning: group XCB_BigRequests_API already documented. Skipping documentation. /Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/src/composite.h:6: Warning: group XCB_Composite_API already documented. Skipping documentation. ... sh: line 1: dot: command not found Problems running dot. Check your installation! make[1]: Leaving directory `/Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb/doc' make[1]: Entering directory `/Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb' make: Leaving directory `/Users/pete/Quellen/X11R7.1/xcb/libxcb' > > Also, I meant to say this earlier: I apologize for taking so long to respond to > your report. I didn't see it until I went searching for XCB-related bugs, a > month after you originally submitted it. I've taken some steps to make sure I > notice such reports in the future. That's OK with me. Since I could avoid the errors by leaving away -D ...
Those are just warnings. I've just committed fixes for most of the Doxygen warnings, but if you have Doxygen and not graphviz then you're still going to get the warnings about missing dot. I suggest you just ignore them, though at some point I guess we should test for whether dot is installed from configure as well.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.