| screenshot 1 |
image/png
|
2009-11-24 16:36:12 UTC |
585.22 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| screenshot 2 |
image/png
|
2009-11-24 16:36:27 UTC |
139.78 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| screenshot 3 |
image/png
|
2009-11-24 16:36:48 UTC |
243.81 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| screenshot 4 (by johanbr) |
image/png
|
2009-11-24 16:37:21 UTC |
848.61 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| screenshot 5 - vs acroread |
image/png
|
2009-11-25 07:24:38 UTC |
139.34 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| screenshot 6 - vs acroread |
image/png
|
2009-11-25 07:25:11 UTC |
366.66 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| Scaled down text vs. xpdf |
image/png
|
2010-01-21 00:09:35 UTC |
142.23 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| test case - scanned scientific article |
application/pdf
|
2010-02-03 05:20:19 UTC |
802.46 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
Attachment cannot be viewed because its MIME type is not text/*, image/*, or application/vnd.mozilla.*.
Download the attachment instead.
| Comparison of acroread and evince for a pdf containing a graph |
image/png
|
2010-02-26 09:55:14 UTC |
275.01 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
| Test-case pdf for graph |
application/x-download
|
2010-02-26 09:59:53 UTC |
967.81 KB |
no flags
|
Details |
Attachment cannot be viewed because its MIME type is not text/*, image/*, or application/vnd.mozilla.*.
Download the attachment instead.
| Comparison of acroread and evince (with new patch) for a pdf containing a graph |
image/png
|
2010-02-28 09:30:59 UTC |
266.90 KB |
no flags
|
Details |