Bug 37307 - Fields for very long titles don't allow the use of reduced versions in TOC
Summary: Fields for very long titles don't allow the use of reduced versions in TOC
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4.4 release
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
QA Contact: Joel Madero
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-18 01:16 UTC by Jose Gómez
Modified: 2013-01-27 20:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
File showing the problem and possible solutions (12.59 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2011-05-18 01:16 UTC, Jose Gómez
Details

Description Jose Gómez 2011-05-18 01:16:51 UTC
Created attachment 46849 [details]
File showing the problem and possible solutions

This is an old bug from the OpenOffice bug report: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700


If a title (a "heading1", for example) is something like this:

    This is a very very very long long long title
    splited over several lines.

the title field will reflect the whole paragraph, but in my heading I want, instead of that, the following:

    A long title...

That is, a reduced version. In latex, you can assign a brief "alias" to a very
long title (something like \Chapter[brief title]{The very long complete
title}), so if you use a fancy header, the alias and not the actual title is displayed in the header.

In OOo/LO, the title field display the whole paragraph, correctly aligned with
line breaks when needed, but there is no way to set an "alias", which is an
important limitation to the design of complex documents.


Another option (solution 2) would be to include the option to truncate the TOC entry so that it will always occupy just one line.
Comment 1 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 12:03:36 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
Comment 2 Jose Gómez 2011-12-23 14:45:21 UTC
This problem is still present in LibreOffice 3.4.4.
Comment 3 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:02:34 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 4 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:03:31 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 5 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:08:05 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 6 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:10:11 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 7 sasha.libreoffice 2012-09-05 09:11:52 UTC
reopening because of RFE
Comment 8 Joel Madero 2013-01-27 19:54:48 UTC
Seems like a good enhancement request to me.

Verified on 3.6.4.3


Marking as:
New (confirmed)
Enhancement (done already)
Low (personally I love the idea but realistically I don't see it impacting work flow much and I think it will only affect a limited number of users.

Thanks for the suggestion!
Comment 9 Urmas 2013-01-27 20:59:02 UTC
Meanwhile it can be solved with assigning 0 level to offending heading, and using the TOC field with desired text instead.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.