Bug 41401 - Distribution menu for images or other objects has not a natural result
Summary: Distribution menu for images or other objects has not a natural result
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Drawing (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4.3 release
Hardware: Other Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-10-02 04:56 UTC by Rpnpif
Modified: 2014-12-11 08:47 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
Example with Tux (53.58 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.graphics)
2011-10-02 05:04 UTC, Rpnpif
Details
The images to distribute (64.06 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.graphics)
2014-10-06 09:38 UTC, Rpnpif
Details

Description Rpnpif 2011-10-02 04:56:00 UTC
Dispose 6 images on a page on 3 rows and 2 columns.
First row : image n.1 and n.2, second row : image n.3 and n.4 and third row, image 5 and 6.

Select all and in the contextual menu, choose distribution with top of vertical mode only.

Result : From top to bottom, the images are arranged as this (no change of column) : 2 on the top, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6. This is not natural and not usable.

Expected result : On the first column, the 3 images of this column are distributed with the same distance versus the top of the images. On the second column, the 3 images of this column are distributed also with the same distance with their tops.
Comment 1 Rpnpif 2011-10-02 05:04:44 UTC
Created attachment 51876 [details]
Example with Tux
Comment 2 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 12:33:45 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
Comment 3 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 13:57:49 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 4 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 13:59:08 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 5 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:03:41 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 6 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:05:56 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 7 Rpnpif 2012-09-01 09:02:44 UTC
No changes with stables releases now.
Comment 8 Rpnpif 2014-09-01 05:26:07 UTC
This bug is still in LO 4.3.1.2.
Comment 9 ign_christian 2014-09-01 09:36:26 UTC
Should be UNCONFIRMED. No confirmation from others yet.
Comment 10 Jean-Baptiste Faure 2014-10-05 16:06:52 UTC
According to the online help, I do not see where would be the bug.
Please, could you elaborate a bit more?
Did you try other distribution options?

Set status to NEEDINFO. Please set it back to UNCONFIRMED once you have provided requested informations. Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards. JBF
Comment 11 Rpnpif 2014-10-06 09:35:42 UTC
(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #10)
> According to the online help, I do not see where would be the bug.
> Please, could you elaborate a bit more?
> Did you try other distribution options?

I'll explain more here, Jean-Baptiste.

On the beginning, the images are arranged with column but approximatively.

The aim is to get the distribution as the first page of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=51876.

With the contextual menu, we cannot easily get this result as in other software.
Vertical distribution is not enough smart. It should recognise the placement in column and work column by column.

Else, I think that this function is not really usable.

Try to distribute this attachment that I'll sent.
I think that this function is really unusable.

Regards.
Comment 12 Rpnpif 2014-10-06 09:38:00 UTC
Created attachment 107409 [details]
The images to distribute

It is difficult to distribute these images with the distribute function.
Comment 13 tommy27 2014-12-11 08:47:29 UTC
(In reply to Rpnpif from comment #12)
> Created attachment 107409 [details]
> The images to distribute
> 
> It is difficult to distribute these images with the distribute function.

confirmed with LibO 4.3.4.1 under Win8.1 x64


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.