Created attachment 75697 [details] Example document has autonumlgl fields in it which get imported as 1 to 8 Writer does not import the AUTONUMLGL field as expected, it converts to a simple number sequence. This is also reported in OpenOffice Issue 25362 Operating System: Windows 7 Version: 4.0.0.3 release
Thank you for reporting this issue! I have been able to confirm the issue on: Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: b8e0455f201198b1deb8f8ca0181e6c9cadc335) Date: Sat Feb 23 16:04:37 2013 -0600 Platform: Bodhi Linux 2.2 x64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ As I've been able to confirm this problem I am marking as: New (confirmed) Enhancement (this is requesting additional features that currently are not supported by LibreOffice) Low The reason why I put low is because even my MS threads on office.microsoft.com I see "AutoNumLgl field numbers....is considered obsolete but is provided for compability with older version of MS Office" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers, every bug is confirmed (triaged) by human beings who mostly give their time for free. We invite you to join our triaging by checking out this link: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage and join us on freenode at #libreoffice-qa Also, good bug reports help tremendously in making the process go smoother, please always provide reproducible steps (even if it seems easy) and attach any and all relevant Lastly, if you don't have time to donate, please consider monetary donation to our great non profit by looking here: http://donate.libreoffice.org/ so we can continue to provide the infrastructure, support, bug fixes, etc... that we all enjoy so much. Remember even $5 goes a long way :)
Created attachment 75702 [details] Contains ListNum LegalDefault field codes Thankyou for your prompt response. I have replaced the field with {ListNum LegalDefault} which seems to be the new format MS Word is useing. Now when I import the number it mostly retains the legal structure but the numbers are now in a random order. I have attached a new document as an example, which should have same numbering as the original.
Indeed - that is a separate issue. If you write up a new bug and CC me on it I'll confirm it. I'll mark that as a true bug not an enhancement as it's clearly screwing up the numbers.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.