Bug 102374

Summary: [BAT] igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic Failed assertion: !mismatch
Product: DRI Reporter: Martin Peres <martin.peres>
Component: DRM/IntelAssignee: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola>
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity: critical    
Priority: highest CC: intel-gfx-bugs, marta.lofstedt
Version: XOrg git   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
i915 platform: BDW, CFL, CNL i915 features: display/Other

Description Martin Peres 2017-08-23 13:57:04 UTC
During a pre-merge run, the test igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic failed on fi-bdw-gvtdvm with the following error:
 	
(kms_frontbuffer_tracking:3702) igt-debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function igt_assert_crc_equal, file igt_debugfs.c:325:
(kms_frontbuffer_tracking:3702) igt-debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !mismatch

There is good confidence from developers that this failure is not due to the patch series, hence why I am filing it.

Full logs: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5473/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
Comment 2 Elizabeth 2017-09-07 14:50:31 UTC
These seem to be hitting the same problem than bug 101309, it could be a dup.
Comment 4 Marta Löfstedt 2017-09-22 13:26:36 UTC
*** Bug 102947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Marta Löfstedt 2017-09-25 05:52:39 UTC
(In reply to Jani Saarinen from comment #5)
> Also seen on CNL now:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3123/fi-cnl-y/
> igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html

Jani, this is why Bug 102947 is a duplicate of this.
Comment 7 Jani Saarinen 2017-09-28 06:16:23 UTC
Reference to patch: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31023/
Comment 8 Jani Saarinen 2017-09-28 08:18:06 UTC
At least fixes issue on CNL
Comment 10 Mika Kahola 2017-09-28 08:19:53 UTC
Fixes also the issue with my GLK+MIPI/DSI system
Comment 11 Rodrigo Vivi 2017-09-28 16:56:38 UTC
Patch merged to dinq.
Thanks for spotting this, all ideas, review and testing.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.