Summary: | llvmpipe consume all resources on GPU Vega RX (amdgpu driver) with mesa 17.2.4 if disabled IGPU | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | mikhail.v.gavrilov |
Component: | Mesa core | Assignee: | mesa-dev |
Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | mesa-dev |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 17.2 | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
mikhail.v.gavrilov
2017-11-26 20:58:47 UTC
You want to be using radeonsi not llvmpipe. llvmpipe is a software renderer and will indeed be slow. You don't understand me. I know how llvmpipe work. I just want to say that in described case llvmpipe consume resources abnormaly (mean much more than usual) > llvmpipe should work with amdgpu same as with VESA driver without consuming all CPU resources.
it means llvmpipe with vesa driver is possible use but llvmpipe with amdgpu impossible use because driver consume for unknown reason much more resources than with vesa driver.
(In reply to mikhail.v.gavrilov from comment #3) > > llvmpipe should work with amdgpu same as with VESA driver without consuming all CPU resources. > > it means llvmpipe with vesa driver is possible use but llvmpipe with amdgpu > impossible use because driver consume for unknown reason much more resources > than with vesa driver. My guess is that you end up with a higher resolution desktop when using amdgpu. With my 4K monitor llvmpipe is extremely slow. > My guess is that you end up with a higher resolution desktop when using amdgpu. With my 4K monitor llvmpipe is extremely slow.
Of course I tested VESA and AMDGPU with the same resolution Full HD.
It just seems suspicious to me that the VESA driver works much better with llvmpipe than AMDGPU on same resolution.
|
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.