Summary: | [bisected] [kabini] [regression] [drm:amdgpufb_create] *ERROR* failed to create fbcon object -12 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Mike Lothian <mike> | ||||||
Component: | DRM/AMDgpu | Assignee: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |||||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||||
Priority: | medium | CC: | dev, mike, robink | ||||||
Version: | DRI git | ||||||||
Hardware: | Other | ||||||||
OS: | All | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Mike Lothian
2018-01-23 22:23:52 UTC
Created attachment 136923 [details]
Dmesg with revert
Please attach the CONFIG_DRM entries of the kernel build configuration file. Hi The CONFIG_DRM entries are as follows: CONFIG_DRM=y CONFIG_DRM_MIPI_DSI=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ORIENTATION_QUIRKS=y CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y CONFIG_DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER=y CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_OVERALLOC=100 CONFIG_DRM_TTM=y CONFIG_DRM_SCHED=y CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU=y CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_PRE_VEGA=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_FBC=y CONFIG_DRM_I915=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_ALPHA_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_COMPRESS_ERROR=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_USERPTR=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL=y CONFIG_DRM_BRIDGE=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE=y Sorry pasted from wrong machine: CONFIG_DRM=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ORIENTATION_QUIRKS=y CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y CONFIG_DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER=y CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_OVERALLOC=100 CONFIG_DRM_TTM=y CONFIG_DRM_SCHED=y CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU=y CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_CIK=y CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_PRE_VEGA=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_FBC=y CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN1_0=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL=y CONFIG_DRM_BRIDGE=y CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE=y Maybe drm_sched_fence_slab_init isn't guaranteed to be called before amdgpu_init when both amdgpu and the GPU scheduler are built into the kernel. Lucas, what do you think? Yeah, the init order isn't correct. Give me a second for a patch. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104736 *** |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.