Bug 10495

Summary:	4 tests in the source-clip-scale failed
Product:	cairo	Reporter:	Guus Leeuw jr. <guus.leeuw>
Component:	image backend	Assignee:	Carl Worth <cworth>
Status:	RESOLVED NOTOURBUG	QA Contact:	cairo-bugs mailing list <cairo-bugs>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.4.3
Hardware:	x86-64 (AMD64)
OS:	Linux (All)
Whiteboard:
i915 platform:		i915 features:

Description Guus Leeuw jr. 2007-04-01 00:04:38 UTC

Contents of the log file:
Testing source-clip-scale with image target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: image FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with image target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: image FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with image target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: image FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with image target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: image FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with xlib target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
48 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 64) from reference image
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: xlib FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: FAIL
Testing source-clip-scale with xlib target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
48 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 64) from reference image
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: xlib FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: FAIL
Testing source-clip-scale with xlib target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
48 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 64) from reference image
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: xlib FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: FAIL
Testing source-clip-scale with xlib target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
48 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 64) from reference image
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: xlib FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: FAIL
Testing source-clip-scale with ps target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: ps FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with ps target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: ps FORMAT: argb32 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with ps target (dev offset 0)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: ps FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 0 RESULT: PASS
Testing source-clip-scale with ps target (dev offset 25)
Comparing result against reference image: ./source-clip-scale-ref.png
TEST: source-clip-scale TARGET: ps FORMAT: rgb24 OFFSET: 25 RESULT: PASS

Comment 1 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-04-03 12:58:22 UTC

xlib failures are kinda ok.  Means you have an older X server than required.  What does "xdpyinfo  | grep vendor" say?

Comment 2 Guus Leeuw jr. 2007-04-03 21:16:36 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> xlib failures are kinda ok.  Means you have an older X server than required. 
> What does "xdpyinfo  | grep vendor" say?

vendor string:    StarNet Communications Corp.
vendor release number:    8000

Comment 3 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-04-04 11:36:11 UTC

You can ignore the failures then.  It's just your xserver.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.