Summary: | [CI] igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-cpu - incomplete - softdog | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | highest | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | KBL | i915 features: |
Description
Marta Löfstedt
2018-04-16 08:08:30 UTC
(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from comment #0) > <7>[ 767.397714] [drm:intel_dp_aux_xfer [i915]] Forbidden recv_bytes = 0 on > aux transaction > <7>[ 767.399013] [drm:intel_dp_read_dpcd [i915]] DPCD: 12 14 84 41 00 00 01 > 01 02 00 00 00 00 0b 00 I don't think I've ever seen this happen. From code: /* * By BSpec: "Message sizes of 0 or >20 are not allowed." * We have no idea of what happened so we return -EBUSY so * drm layer takes care for the necessary retries. */ However, the retry seems to succeed just fine, so I'm not sure if the dmesg part here is a red herring, and the bug is somewhere else. (In reply to Jani Nikula from comment #1) > (In reply to Marta Löfstedt from comment #0) > > <7>[ 767.397714] [drm:intel_dp_aux_xfer [i915]] Forbidden recv_bytes = 0 on > > aux transaction > > <7>[ 767.399013] [drm:intel_dp_read_dpcd [i915]] DPCD: 12 14 84 41 00 00 01 > > 01 02 00 00 00 00 0b 00 > > I don't think I've ever seen this happen. From code: > > /* > * By BSpec: "Message sizes of 0 or >20 are not allowed." > * We have no idea of what happened so we return -EBUSY so > * drm layer takes care for the necessary retries. > */ > > However, the retry seems to succeed just fine, so I'm not sure if the dmesg > part here is a red herring, and the bug is somewhere else. It could be a duplicate of bug 105959. However, I believe that there is too much time in-between the the backtrace and when owatch triggers. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105959 *** |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.