| Summary: | [CI] igt@gem_pipe_control_store_loop@reused-buffer - fail - Failed assertion: buf[0] == val | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Martin Peres <martin.peres> |
| Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
| Version: | XOrg git | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
| i915 platform: | I965GM | i915 features: | display/Other |
|
Description
Martin Peres
2018-04-24 14:35:20 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_37/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_pipe_control_store_loop@fresh-buffer.html (gem_pipe_control_store_loop:1214) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function store_pipe_control_loop, file ../tests/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c:147: (gem_pipe_control_store_loop:1214) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: buf[0] == val Subtest fresh-buffer failed. This one has been passing in a few last idle runs. Do we have per test history for idle runs? (In reply to Tvrtko Ursulin from comment #2) > This one has been passing in a few last idle runs. > > Do we have per test history for idle runs? The reproduction rate of this bug from the first occurrence is that, failure occurs once in 17.5 runs (idle runs/drmtip). Last seen on drmtip_131. We can close this bug after drmtip_306 if no new failures by then. (In reply to Lakshmi from comment #3) > (In reply to Tvrtko Ursulin from comment #2) > > This one has been passing in a few last idle runs. > > > > Do we have per test history for idle runs? > > The reproduction rate of this bug from the first occurrence is that, failure > occurs once in 17.5 runs (idle runs/drmtip). Last seen on drmtip_131. > > We can close this bug after drmtip_306 if no new failures by then. We are at drmtip_318, closing! The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.