Summary: | guc_fw_xfer error with i915.enable_guc=2 kernel mode parameter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | ryanboehning | ||||||
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED INVALID | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> | ||||||
Severity: | major | ||||||||
Priority: | medium | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs | ||||||
Version: | unspecified | ||||||||
Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | Triaged, ReadyForDev | ||||||||
i915 platform: | CFL | i915 features: | firmware/guc | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
ryanboehning
2018-05-06 18:17:23 UTC
Created attachment 139399 [details]
just the drm logs
(In reply to ryanboehning from comment #0) > kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:i915_driver_load [i915]] Device > initialization failed (-110) > kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: Please file a bug at > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI against DRM/Intel > providing the dmesg log by booting with drm.debug=0xf We shouldn't request a bug report if you set unsafe parameters. How else are you supposed to enable the HuC and GuC? Likely dupe of #105653 Reported, agree duplicate? Reporter, do you agree this as duplicate? I'm not sure. There's two dmesg logs with "*ERROR* GuC firmware xfer error -110" in #105653. Aside from that line, the dmesg logs are quite different. It might be the same underlying bug, or it might be two (or three) bugs in the same piece of firmware. If you want to close this as a dup, I'm fine with that as long as my logs are copied to the #105653. Guc not really supported upstream, yet, closing. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.