Summary: | [r600g] 5 of 30 piglit sanity tests fail (PCIe, ppc64, mesa-18.3.4) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | erhard_f |
Component: | Drivers/Gallium/r600 | Assignee: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | PowerPC | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107470 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: |
results from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.1.5)
html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.1.5) html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.0.5) html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.3.4) results from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.3.4) |
Created attachment 140929 [details]
html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.1.5)
Observation: bswap32(16777216) == 1 bswap32(50331648) == 3 bswap32(83886080) == 5 For the second test, probably some TF thing that needs to either be configured for BE or get byte-swapped somewhere. Hm, so you think the sanity test itself got broken and not a r600g component? I am no expert, sorry. (In reply to erhard_f from comment #3) > Hm, so you think the sanity test itself got broken and not a r600g > component? I am no expert, sorry. No clue. Just an observation for someone who will maybe at one point look into it. Created attachment 140950 [details] html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.0.5) Same test failures with mesa 18.0.5. So I guess it's piglit itself failing, as at the time I did first piglit tests with 18.0.x on ppc64 (see bug #105463) the sanity tests passed. Meanwhile, on another machine (Talos II + Radeon HD 6450), another mesa (18.2.2) and rebuilt piglit from git-master. But same test-failures here. Created attachment 143610 [details]
html-summary from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.3.4)
Created attachment 143611 [details]
results from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.3.4)
As mesa progresses, piglit sanity tests error count on ppc64 progresses. ;)
Command
/root/build/piglit/bin/shader_runner /root/build/piglit/tests/spec/arb_tessellation_shader/execution/sanity.shader_test -auto -fboStderr
Stderr
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_ENUM in glGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(invalid attachment GL_NONE)
Stdout
Probe color at (0,0)
Expected: 0 255 0 255
Observed: 25 25 25 25
Test failure on line 57
Command
/root/build/piglit/bin/shader_runner /root/build/piglit/generated_tests/spec/arb_tessellation_shader/execution/built-in-functions/tcs-any-bvec4-using-if.shader_test -auto -fbo
Stderr
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_ENUM in glGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(invalid attachment GL_NONE)
Stdout
Probe color at (0,0)
Expected: 0 0 255 255
Observed: 0 0 255 0
Test failure on line 92
Probe color at (4,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 93
Probe color at (8,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 94
Probe color at (12,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 95
Probe color at (16,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 96
Probe color at (20,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 97
Probe color at (24,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 98
Probe color at (28,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 99
Probe color at (32,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 100
Probe color at (36,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 101
Probe color at (40,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 102
Probe color at (44,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 103
Probe color at (48,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 104
Probe color at (52,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 105
Probe color at (56,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 106
Probe color at (60,0)
Expected: 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 107
Command
/root/build/piglit/bin/shader_runner /root/build/piglit/tests/spec/arb_tessellation_shader/execution/barrier-patch.shader_test -auto -fbo
Stderr
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_ENUM in glGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(invalid attachment GL_NONE)
Stdout
Probe color at (0,0)
Expected: 0 255 0 255
Observed: 0 0 0 255
Test failure on line 79
Probe color at (0,0)
Expected: 0 255 0 255
Observed: 0 0 0 255
Test failure on line 86
Command
/root/build/piglit/bin/glsl-1.50-transform-feedback-builtins -auto -fbo
Stderr
Stdout
Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 0. Expected 1, got 16777216.
Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 1. Expected 3, got 50331648.
Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 2. Expected 5, got 83886080.
Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 0. Expected 1, got 16777216.
Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 1. Expected 2, got 33554432.
Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 2. Expected 3, got 50331648.
Command
/root/build/piglit/bin/shader_runner /root/build/piglit/generated_tests/spec/amd_shader_trinary_minmax/execution/built-in-functions/tcs-max3-vec4-vec4-vec4.shader_test -auto -fbo
Stderr
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_ENUM in glGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(invalid attachment GL_NONE)Stdout
Probe color at (0,0)
Expected: 0 255 0 255
Observed: 0 0 255 0
Test failure on line 160
Probe color at (4,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 161
Probe color at (8,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 162
Probe color at (12,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 163
Probe color at (16,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 164
Probe color at (20,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 165
Probe color at (24,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 166
Probe color at (28,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 167
Probe color at (32,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 168
Probe color at (36,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 169
Probe color at (40,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 170
Probe color at (44,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 171
Probe color at (48,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 172
Probe color at (52,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 173
Probe color at (56,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 174
Probe color at (60,0)
Expected: 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 1.000000
Observed: 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Test failure on line 175
According to on Comment 1 on bug #107470 this is most probably not a piglit bug itself, but a driver bug. -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/issues/642. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Created attachment 140928 [details] results from 'pigllit run sanity' (18.1.5) Machine is a PowerMac G5 11,2 + Radeon HD 6450. Command /root/build/piglit/bin/shader_runner /root/build/piglit/test/spec/arb_tessellation_shader/execution/sanity.shader_test -auto -fbo Stdout Probe color at (0,0) Expected: 0 255 0 255 Observed: 25 25 25 25 Test failure on line 57 Stderr Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_ENUM in lGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(invalid attachment GL_NONE) Command /root/build/piglit/bin/glsl-1.50-transform-feedback-builtins -auto -fbo Stdout Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 0. Expected 1, got 16777216. Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 1. Expected 3, got 50331648. Incorrect data for 'gl_Layer' output 2. Expected 5, got 83886080. Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 0. Expected 1, got 16777216. Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 1. Expected 2, got 33554432. Incorrect data for 'gl_ViewportIndex' output 2. Expected 3, got 50331648.