Summary: | Distribute source code using .tar.xz archives | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | dbus | Reporter: | Francesco Turco <fturco> |
Component: | core | Assignee: | Simon McVittie <smcv> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | D-Bus Maintainers <dbus> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | low | Keywords: | patch |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | review+ | ||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: |
xz.patch
hacking.patch doc.patch build: Don't ship detailed changelogs for releases over 10 years old Remove old changelogs from git build: Don't install a ChangeLog that we don't update Distribute source code using .tar.xz archives |
dbus is not a large package, so saving a few K of disk space and bandwidth for people who build it from source is not a particularly high priority. You'd save more disk space and bandwidth by using a binary distribution. If this is important to you, perhaps you could contribute a patch for configure.ac that makes "make dist" produce an xz archive instead of a gzip archive? I think that change would be OK on the master (1.13.x) branch. I don't want to release source code for the same release in multiple formats, so if we produce xz archives, we should *only* produce xz archives from that point onward. I think the stable branches (1.12.x, 1.10.x etc.) should continue to use the same source format as 1.12.0 and 1.10.0, because stable branches are meant to be predictable. If 1.13.x switches to xz, then a future 1.14.x stable branch would continue to use xz. Not distributing ChangeLog.pre-* would probably be another easy way to save an amount of archive size comparable to what you save by using xz. Created attachment 141221 [details] [review] xz.patch With my patch the "make dist" command now produces a xz tarball instead of a gz one. Comment on attachment 141221 [details] [review] xz.patch Review of attachment 141221 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- If you’re going to change the distribution format, you might as well also change the dbus-docs.tar.gz target in doc/Makefile.am, and the scp instructions in HACKING. Created attachment 141240 [details] [review] hacking.patch Created attachment 141241 [details] [review] doc.patch Created attachment 141257 [details] [review] build: Don't ship detailed changelogs for releases over 10 years old --- I wouldn't be surprised if this saved an amount of space comparable to using xz. Created attachment 141258 [details] [review] Remove old changelogs from git The changelogs (and the commits themselves, converted to git format) are still in the git history if anyone needs them. --- I used git format-patch --irreversible-delete for this, because uploading the diff would be ridiculous. Here's the diffstat: ChangeLog.pre-1-0 | 15146 -------------------------------------------- ChangeLog.pre-1-2 | 2027 ------ 2 files changed, 17173 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 ChangeLog.pre-1-0 delete mode 100644 ChangeLog.pre-1-2 Created attachment 141259 [details] [review] build: Don't install a ChangeLog that we don't update Created attachment 141260 [details] [review] Distribute source code using .tar.xz archives From: Francesco Turco <fturco fastmail fm> This saves around 32% of the size of the archive. --- This combines Attachment #141221 [details], Attachment #141240 [details] and Attachment #141241 [details], rebased onto current git master (and Attachment #141259 [details]) in which HACKING has been renamed to CONTRIBUTING. If you would prefer a different commit message or attribution, please attach a git commit formatted with `git format-patch`. (In reply to Simon McVittie from comment #1) > Not distributing ChangeLog.pre-* would probably be another easy way to save > an amount of archive size comparable to what you save by using xz. I took the opportunity to do this: they're just dead weight. Comment on attachment 141257 [details] [review] build: Don't ship detailed changelogs for releases over 10 years old Review of attachment 141257 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r+ Comment on attachment 141259 [details] [review] build: Don't install a ChangeLog that we don't update Review of attachment 141259 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r+ Comment on attachment 141260 [details] [review] Distribute source code using .tar.xz archives Review of attachment 141260 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r+ r+ on everything including the deletion of the old ChangeLogs (which Splinter doesn’t let me review individually). Fixed in git for 1.13.8, thanks |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Currently dbus source code is distributed using .tar.gz archives. In my opinion dbus (along with dbus-glib and dbus-python) should use .tar.xz archives instead. On my system: > $ du -k dbus-1.12.10.tar.?? > 2028 dbus-1.12.10.tar.gz > 1388 dbus-1.12.10.tar.xz By using the XZ format we can save about 32% of disk space and bandwidth. What do you think?