| Summary: | [ivb hsw bdw skl kbl cfl] Regressions in deqp and glcts following 9176703788c and b03dcb1e5f5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | Clayton Craft <clayton.a.craft> |
| Component: | Drivers/DRI/i965 | Assignee: | Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List <intel-3d-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List <intel-3d-bugs> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | git | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
hello Clayton. I ran all these tests on Mesa 18.3.0-develgit-3a9f628, and for me they are passing (for GL46 I made an override before): kernel 4.15.0-30-generic ubuntu 16.04 KBL (630 GT2) All these runs were successful. ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.state_query.max_uniform_buffer_bindings ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.state_query.max_combined_texture_image_units ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getinteger64 ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getinteger ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getfloat ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getinteger64 ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getinteger ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getfloat ./glcts -n dEQP-GLES31.functional.compute.basic.ubo_to_ssbo_multiple_groups MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=4.6 ./glcts -n KHR-GL46.map_buffer_alignment.functional MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=4.6 ./glcts -n KHR-GL46.limits.max_uniform_buffer_bindings Fixed by: 93e8e17fa41 * Revert "mesa: bump GL_MAX_ELEMENTS_INDICES and GL_MAX_ELEMENTS_VERTICES" 9d670fd86cc * Revert recent changes about not including compute in combined limits. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
The following tests are failing after commits 9176703788c and b03dcb1e5f5: dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.state_query.max_uniform_buffer_bindings dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.state_query.max_combined_texture_image_units dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getinteger64 dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getinteger dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_uniform_buffer_bindings_getfloat dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getinteger64 dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getinteger dEQP-GLES31.functional.state_query.integer.max_combined_texture_image_units_getfloat dEQP-GLES31.functional.compute.basic.ubo_to_ssbo_multiple_groups KHR-GL46.map_buffer_alignment.functional KHR-GL46.limits.max_uniform_buffer_bindings Output from one of the tests (dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.state_query.max_uniform_buffer_bindings): glGetIntegerv(GL_MAX_UNIFORM_BUFFER_BINDINGS, 0x00007fff3119b184); // data = { 70 } glGetError(); // GL_NO_ERROR returned // ERROR: Expected greater or equal to 72, got 70 glGetBooleanv(GL_MAX_UNIFORM_BUFFER_BINDINGS, 0x00007fff3119b18e); // data = { GL_TRUE } glGetError(); // GL_NO_ERROR returned glGetInteger64v(GL_MAX_UNIFORM_BUFFER_BINDINGS, 0x00007fff3119b168); // data = { 70 } glGetError(); // GL_NO_ERROR returned // ERROR: Expected greater or equal to 72, got 70 glGetFloatv(GL_MAX_UNIFORM_BUFFER_BINDINGS, 0x00007fff3119b158); // data = { 70 } glGetError(); // GL_NO_ERROR returned // ERROR: Expected greater or equal to 72, got 70