| Summary: | [CI][DRMTIP] igt@prime_busy@wait-hang-render- fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum> |
| Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | mwa <matthew.auld> |
| Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs, przanoni |
| Version: | DRI git | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
| i915 platform: | BXT, BYT, GLK, HSW, ICL, ILK, SNB | i915 features: | GEM/Other |
|
Description
Lakshmi
2018-11-20 12:55:55 UTC
Make up your mind about what you want to report. (In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #1) > Make up your mind about what you want to report. Sorry..I copied wrong one Starting subtest: wait-hang-render Stack trace: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1467 __igt_fail_assert() #1 ../tests/prime_busy.c:164 busy() #2 ../tests/prime_busy.c:204 test_engine_mode() #3 ../tests/prime_busy.c:243 __real_main218() #4 ../tests/prime_busy.c:218 main() #5 ../csu/libc-start.c:344 __libc_start_main() #6 [_start+0x2a] Subtest wait-hang-render: FAIL (13.816s) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1486: Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring) Err Starting subtest: wait-hang-render (prime_busy:2433) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function busy, file ../tests/prime_busy.c:162: (prime_busy:2433) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) Subtest wait-hang-render failed. **** DEBUG **** (prime_busy:2433) igt_debugfs-DEBUG: Opening debugfs directory '/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0' (prime_busy:2433) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == 0 (prime_busy:2433) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function busy, file ../tests/prime_busy.c:162: (prime_busy:2433) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace: (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1467 __igt_fail_assert() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #1 ../tests/prime_busy.c:164 busy() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #2 ../tests/prime_busy.c:204 test_engine_mode() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #3 ../tests/prime_busy.c:243 __real_main218() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #4 ../tests/prime_busy.c:218 main() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #5 ../csu/libc-start.c:344 __libc_start_main() (prime_busy:2433) igt_core-INFO: #6 [_start+0x2a] **** END **** Subtest wait-hang-render: FAIL (13.816s) https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5167/shard-glk5/igt@prime_busy@wait-hang-render.html Pretty sure it goes wrong at the sync_file level -- but I don't think we check the equivalent gem_busy hang in CI at all. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5345/shard-apl7/igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd.html Starting subtest: hang-bsd (prime_busy:2348) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function busy, file ../tests/prime_busy.c:162: (prime_busy:2348) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) Subtest hang-bsd failed. Can't reproduce this on my GLK machine after 500 runs. This might be dependent on results of previous tests. I'll keep trying. Try to see what is sharded test list when issue occurs. So in this case use tests on this list eg. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5345/shard-apl7/run0.log and generate list or get that from IGT_4754 and shards list. A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
No new failures caught with the new filter
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
New failures caught by the filter:
* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4791/shard-hsw8/igt@prime_busy@hang-blt.html
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
No new failures caught with the new filter
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ SNB SNBm HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
New failures caught by the filter:
* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5500/shard-snb6/igt@prime_busy@hang-blt.html
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- SNB SNBm HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ SNB SNBm BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
New failures caught by the filter:
* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_203/fi-byt-j1900/igt@prime_busy@hang-blt.html
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- SNB SNBm BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ ILK SNB SNBm BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
New failures caught by the filter:
* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_206/fi-ilk-650/igt@prime_busy@hang-render.html
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- ILK SNB SNBm BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ ILK SNB BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
No new failures caught with the new filter
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:
{- ILK SNB BYT HSW APL GLK: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) -}
{+ ILK SNB BYT HSW APL GLK ICL: igt@prime_busy@(wait-)?hang-* - fail - Failed assertion: !prime_busy(&pfd[SCRATCH], true) +}
New failures caught by the filter:
* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_285/fi-icl-y/igt@prime_busy@hang-vebox.html
Martin says we always blow up on the !prime_busy logic, so I guess first debug step would be a test patch to expand the race window (in case there is one) with a pile of sleeps and see what happens. Otherwise not much ideas, test seems to be doing the right things from a quick look. -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/187. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.