Bug 110269

Summary: [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_exec_big@single - WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
Product: DRI Reporter: Martin Peres <martin.peres>
Component: DRM/IntelAssignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity: normal    
Priority: high CC: intel-gfx-bugs
Version: XOrg git   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
i915 platform: GLK, KBL i915 features: GEM/Other

Description Martin Peres 2019-03-28 11:44:18 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4905/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_big@single.html

	

Starting subtest: single
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
(gem_exec_big:1032) WARNING: Warning on condition gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1 in function execN, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c:173
Ad lib...
Comment 2 CI Bug Log 2019-03-28 12:38:06 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* KBL: igt@runner@aborted - fail - Previous test: gem_exec_big (single)
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5817/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-04-01 06:59:19 UTC
Should be fixed by https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58670/
Comment 4 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-04-01 07:00:30 UTC
> Should be fixed by https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58670/

Once it's merged...
Comment 5 Chris Wilson 2019-04-04 11:27:47 UTC
commit 014a6fa238322b497116b359cb92df1ce7fa8847 (HEAD, upstream/master)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Mar 28 11:49:25 2019 +0000

    i915/gem_exec_big: Only warn for the first sign of a pagefault
    
    We only need the warning once, not for the several thousand relocations
    we try. The current execbuf implementation will set all presumed_offset
    to -1 so this loop should quit on the first entry if we hit the
    pagefault, but for the sake of completeness check all.
    
    Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Comment 6 CI Bug Log 2019-04-08 10:57:19 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.