Summary: | [CI][DRMTIP][icl-dsi] igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - Invalid RING_NONPRIV[3], expected 0x10002349, found 0x00002348 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | highest | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | ICL | i915 features: | GEM/Other |
Description
Lakshmi
2019-07-03 12:24:29 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * icl-dsi: igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - dmesg-fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count) - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6401/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6403/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6404/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13502/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13413/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13425/fi-icl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds.html That's just a warning, the fail is: <7> [360.066418] [drm:intel_power_well_enable [i915]] enabling always-on <6> [360.069945] RING_NONPRIV[0]: expected 0x0000731c, found 0x0000731c <6> [360.069948] RING_NONPRIV[1]: expected 0x0000e18c, found 0x0000e18c <6> [360.069951] RING_NONPRIV[2]: expected 0x0000e194, found 0x0000e194 <6> [360.069955] RING_NONPRIV[3]: expected 0x10002349, found 0x00002348 <6> [360.069958] RING_NONPRIV[4]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069961] RING_NONPRIV[5]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069964] RING_NONPRIV[6]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069967] RING_NONPRIV[7]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069970] RING_NONPRIV[8]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069973] RING_NONPRIV[9]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069976] RING_NONPRIV[10]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <6> [360.069980] RING_NONPRIV[11]: expected 0x00002094, found 0x00002094 <3> [360.069983] Invalid RING_NONPRIV[3], expected 0x10002349, found 0x00002348 <3> [360.070035] Invalid whitelist *before* engine reset! I think it is just the stepping in use on icl-dsi. A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- icl-dsi: igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - dmesg-fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count) -} {+ icl-dsi: igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - dmesg-fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count) +} No new failures caught with the new filter A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- icl-dsi: igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - dmesg-fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count) -} {+ icl-dsi: igt@i915_selftest@live_workarounds - dmesg-fail -Invalid RING_NONPRIV[3], expected 0x10002349, found 0x00002348 +} No new failures caught with the new filter Chris, What is user impact of this failure? (In reply to Radosław Szwichtenberg from comment #5) > Chris, > What is user impact of this failure? They should return their preproduction icl in exchange for a production model. Adding comments from Kumar Valsan, Prathap: This is not actual BUG and expected on this stepping. We need to run this test with on machines that is not PPOR:POR_M1. Closing this bug as NOTABUG. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.