Summary: | [CI][DRMTIP] igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | BYT | i915 features: | GEM/Other |
Description
Lakshmi
2019-08-12 11:48:51 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * BYT: igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_341/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_341/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_340/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_340/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html Hmm, <7> [297.642048] hangcheck bcs0 <7> [297.642063] hangcheck Awake? 4 <7> [297.642074] hangcheck Hangcheck: 8000 ms ago <7> [297.642084] hangcheck Reset count: 0 (global 294) <7> [297.642094] hangcheck Requests: <7> [297.642119] hangcheck active 6:12ce2* @ 8512ms: gem_eio[1149] <7> [297.642130] hangcheck ring->start: 0x007f1000 <7> [297.642140] hangcheck ring->head: 0x00003890 <7> [297.642149] hangcheck ring->tail: 0x00002a50 <7> [297.642158] hangcheck ring->emit: 0x00002a50 <7> [297.642168] hangcheck ring->space: 0x00000e00 <7> [297.642177] hangcheck ring->hwsp: 0x007eb100 that ring->space suggests we blocked waiting for space (and so hung before we ourselves performed the reset). reset_stress() expects to submit 21 batches without a problem, that might have been optimistic. Should be commit d62008b45c735c32c5e52dd14c5ad2a4ba57feb5 (upstream/master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Mon Aug 12 16:10:49 2019 +0100 i915/gem_eio: Restrict number of batches of submitted Make sure we don't block while setting up the stress case before the reset by only submitting less batches than would fill the ring. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111379 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> (In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #3) > Should be > > commit d62008b45c735c32c5e52dd14c5ad2a4ba57feb5 (upstream/master, > origin/master, > origin/HEAD) > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Mon Aug 12 16:10:49 2019 +0100 > > i915/gem_eio: Restrict number of batches of submitted > > Make sure we don't block while setting up the stress case before the > reset by only submitting less batches than would fill the ring. > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111379 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Thanks! It was seen on twice per run on 3 consecutive runs, and then nothing since this patch (~10 runs). The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.