Summary: | [CI][SHARDS] igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | CFL, ICL, TGL | i915 features: | GEM/Other |
Description
Lakshmi
2019-10-01 08:52:57 UTC
> (i915_selftest:1428) igt_kmod-WARNING: i915: probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed
> with error -5
> (i915_selftest:1428) igt_kmod-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
> igt_kselftest_execute, file ../lib/igt_kmod.c:548:
> (i915_selftest:1428) igt_kmod-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: err == 0
> (i915_selftest:1428) igt_kmod-CRITICAL: kselftest "i915
> igt__20__live_requests=1 live_selftests=-1 disable_display=1 st_filter="
> failed: Input/output error [5]
NOTOURBUG?
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14592/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14592/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14594/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14594/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_5101/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14595/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6979/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6979/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live_evict.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6979/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html No, it's just a lot slower due to the sensitive interrupt avoidance scheme. commit d9fbb8f48f0ef537bf1c7cd81da1e46595617fe3 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Mon Sep 30 20:49:28 2019 +0100 TGL HAX drm/i915/tgl: Magic interrupt shadow to relieve some random lockups Seems to have a big impact in CI, setting impact to major and priority to high. Experiment over. A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 -} {+ CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7002/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7005/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7016/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html (In reply to CI Bug Log from comment #6) > A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: > > {- TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with > error -5 -} > {+ CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 > failed with error -5 +} > > New failures caught by the filter: > > * > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7002/fi-icl-u2/ > igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html > * > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7005/fi-icl-u2/ > igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html > * > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7016/fi-cfl-guc/ > igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html @Chris, Are these failures are part of this bug? A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 -} {+ CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5216/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7030/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5217/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7038/shard-hsw7/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 -} {+ HSW CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 +} No new failures caught with the new filter @Chris, This issue is still occurring regularly. (In reply to Lakshmi from comment #10) > @Chris, This issue is still occurring regularly. No, wrong bug. A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- HSW CFL ICL TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 -} {+ TGL: igt@i915_selftest@* - dmesg-fail - probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5 +} No new failures caught with the new filter |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.