Summary: | xserver vs. VTs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi> |
Component: | Server/General | Assignee: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | minor | ||
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-08-29 03:56:26 UTC
yeah, I'm implementing a -novtswitch for Ubuntu (well, implemented), which doesn't do an initial switch, and also doesn't switch away when it's done the only problem with this approach is that people type 'startx' and expect it to function as a program does -> start the program and show itself (switch VTs to the new one), and then stop the program and hide itself (switch VTs back to textmode) this is why I've implemented it as a flag there's also -sharevts, if you want multiple servers sharing the same VT, but that's total crack -novtswitch and -sharevts are in HEAD now, closing. urgs. somehow i missed stoned's ;) mail ... :( -novtswitch is too aggressive - suppressing the initial vt switch is counterproductive in my case. i need to add additional code to compensate it. -sharevts is severely underdocumented, and i must admit that after a quick skim over the code i don't really understand how it works. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.