| Summary: | hal-info always requires hal 0.5.10 to be installed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | hal | Reporter: | dufflebunk |
| Component: | hal-info | Assignee: | David Zeuthen (not reading bugmail) <zeuthen> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
|
Description
dufflebunk
2007-11-04 22:08:40 UTC
1) hal don't depend on hal-info 2) the check is correct, since the current hal-info package contains new FDI-directives (*_outof) which only work with hal >= 0.5.10 Quoting from http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/hal: hal-info and hal should not be packaged together. When packaging hal, it should depend on hal-info, of any version. hal-info should also be checked out in the same level directory as hal if you intend to use ./run-hald.sh You're saying that there is no compile time dependency for Hal on hal-info? Or are you saying that the paragraph is entirely wrong and hal shouldn't depend at all on hal-info? oops, forgot to reopen when I commented. (In reply to comment #2) > You're saying that there is no compile time dependency for Hal on hal-info? Yes, I say there is no compile, but maybe (as in this case) a runtime dependency. Because of this I would say: hal-info depends on hal and not otherwise. Btw. we changed this already to be a warning instead of an error. Set bug back to old state. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.