| Summary: | Intel-batchbuffer crashes running x11perf -comppixwin500 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Ben Gamari <bgamari> | ||||||||
| Component: | Driver/intel | Assignee: | Eric Anholt <eric> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||||
| Version: | git | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Other | ||||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
Created attachment 16084 [details]
Xorg log
The crash from the comppixwin500 test has always prevented X from restarting, requiring a reboot. I will attach a log of an xserver started after a crash. It seems that also the -scroll500 test also causes a similar crash (failed to map pixmap in I830EXAPrepareAccess()) although it seems that X will start restart after -scroll500 crashes. Created attachment 16085 [details]
Log of X server after failing to start due to previous crash
It appears the development on intel-batchbuffer has stopped. Eric, shall we close this bug? Gordon, yes, none of our engineers will be spending any time on the intel-batchbuffer branch at this point, and we don't expect to ever merge the intel-batchbuffer branch. Eric, so shall we mark intel-batchbuffer bugs as wontfix? Could we even delete the branch since it's dead? I guess some people don't know the status and will be wasting time on that branch. update bug status. mark as wontfix as this batch-buffer is dead... |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Created attachment 16083 [details] Backtrace The intel-batchbuffer branch of the xf86-video-intel driver segfaults when running the comppixwin500 xperf test (and possibly others, haven't looked into that yet). Attached is a backtrace and X log.