Summary: | PropertyModified not sent as per spec | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | hal | Reporter: | Johan Bilien <jobi> |
Component: | hald | Assignee: | David Zeuthen (not reading bugmail) <zeuthen> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | danny.kukawka |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: | fix for hald_dbus.h and spec |
Description
Johan Bilien
2008-06-19 07:57:31 UTC
Created attachment 17396 [details]
fix for hald_dbus.h and spec
Patch including fix for hald_dbus.h and spec. I wouldn't change the code to send the signal as in the spec, because IMO everyone already use it as it currently is.
- <entry>Int num_changes, Array of struct {String property_name, Bool added, Bool removed}</entry> + <entry>Int num_changes, Array of struct {String property_name, Bool removed, Bool added}</entry> - dbus_bool_t removed, - dbus_bool_t added); + dbus_bool_t added, + dbus_bool_t removed); makes the prototype not agree with the spec again :) I think you meant to change the .c (In reply to comment #2) > makes the prototype not agree with the spec again :) > > I think you meant to change the .c No, why? The spec is about the DBus signal and not about the internal code of hald_dbus.c which is never visible for external user. I change the .h file to what the code already do and change the spec to reflect the current behavior of HAL via DBus Commited to git |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.