Summary: | [915GM] xrandr crash X | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | zhao jian <jian.j.zhao> | ||||||||||
Component: | Driver/intel | Assignee: | haihao <haihao.xiang> | ||||||||||
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||||||
Severity: | critical | ||||||||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | keithp, unggnu, zhenyu.z.wang | ||||||||||
Version: | git | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | Other | ||||||||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 17452 | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Created attachment 21581 [details]
xorg.0.log
Other machines don't have this issue. I think we've tested 915GM in Q4-rc1 and it was fine. Jian, please try bisect. This seems an xserver regression. And it's interesting other platforms including 945GM are fine. Reassign this critical bug to Haihao as Zhenyu is not available today. Created attachment 21648 [details] [review] restore block handler I only test this patch on 915GM. Could you test it on other machines? (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=21648) [details] > restore block handler > > I only test this patch on 915GM. Could you test it on other machines? > thanks ,I have tested your patch on 855gm ,915gm ,945gm and gm965, No regression. and 915gm works against this patch. Patch looks good to me. Please send it to keithp and xorg list. As this is a xserver issue, it shouldn't block driver 2.6. Maybe this patch is incorrect. If the header of the block handler link pScreen->BlockHandler is not xf86RotateBlockHandler, this patch will remove some other block handlers from the link. Created attachment 21667 [details] [review] new patch to fix this bug This patch avoids a potential endless loop which is introduced by 8f17a31aa721e42925cd6b4616ccad90497818f3: pScreen->BlockHandler and xf86_config->BlockHandler all point to xf86RotateBlockHandler. Keith has pushed this path into xserver master. Thanks. commit 5f3188228eb988bd8f08b62c84f98a8ff66ee283 Author: Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> Date: Tue Jan 6 10:03:19 2009 +0800 avoid a potential endless loop. Keith, could you cherry pick haihao's patch into server-1.6-branch? This bug seems quite critical, so I'd like to see it made into xserver-1.6. Fixes that need to get into 1.6 should block the 1.6 release bug, and should be posted to the Server16Branch wiki page *** Bug 19629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** verified against: Libdrm: (master)0054e14793e585ec0d8e95e3d7b82cbf1a684af8 Mesa: (mesa_7_4_branch)0e6d9c1a55510cb4096728fb5fcfac77be09129e Xserver: (server-1.6-branch)660c2a7d4c6cb52fd0992e9d2008a24805dc8c02 Xf86_video_intel: (master)506bbb8341c052499057834a669b82787454b426 GEM_kernel: (drm-intel-2.6.28)fbb12e74c6793652ae323d78fa3312a8787ff021 |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Created attachment 21580 [details] xorg.conf System Environment: ---------------------- Host: 915gm Arch: i386 OSD: Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) Kernel: 2.6.28-release Libdrm: (master) c34539e8bb5568b1d6059abf139dd08e07e84eea Mesa: (intel-2008-q4) 88f4b17555be36f3023f74a1b9c792294f09912b Xorg: 7.2 Xserver: (server-1.6-branch) 32e81074b967716865aef08b66ec29caf0fec2c5 Xf86_video_intel: (xf86-video-intel-2.6-branch) 6371dbbee3051d7ac614f5d7a794519a4c04deeb Bug Description: --------------------- After start X, X will crash if I type 'xrandr -q', with the following information: (EE) intel(0): underrun on pipe B! xterm: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) or KillClient on X server ":0.0" XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0" after 11 requests (10 known processed) with 0 events remaining. Following is the information I debugged with gdb: (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1209530608 (LWP 2773)] 0x080eb221 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 warning: Source file is more recent than executable. 288 (*pScreen->BlockHandler) (screenNum, blockData, pTimeout, pReadmask); (gdb) bt #0 0x080eb221 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #1 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #2 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #3 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #4 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #5 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #6 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #7 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #8 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, pTimeout=0xbf9daa98, pReadmask=0x81de460) at xf86Rotate.c:288 #9 0x080eb238 in xf86RotateBlockHandler (screenNum=0, blockData=0x0, ......... #1000 .... (endless but the same) Reproduce steps: ---------------- 1. xinit& 2. xrandr -q