Bug 19613

Summary:	ContactInfo: terminology inconsistent with RFC2426, and no room for expansion
Product:	Telepathy	Reporter:	Simon McVittie <smcv>
Component:	tp-spec	Assignee:	Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:	Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	medium	Keywords:	patch
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
URL:	http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/smcv/telepathy-spec-smcv.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/contactinfo
Whiteboard:
i915 platform:		i915 features:

Description Simon McVittie 2009-01-16 09:29:19 UTC

In the current ContactInfo draft, vCard fields are refered

Comment 1 Simon McVittie 2009-01-16 09:31:26 UTC

Oops, didn't mean to submit that yet. What I meant to say was:

In the current ContactInfo draft, vCard fields' type parameters are referred to as "flags". The RFC calls them type parameters, and we should call them that, to avoid confusion with our <tp:flags> (bitfield) structures.

Also, Mandatory is a boolean when it could usefully be a uint containing a bitfield of flags, with one flag (Parameters_Mandatory) currently defined.

My contactinfo branch documents this.

Comment 2 Simon McVittie 2009-02-02 03:50:32 UTC

Fixed in 0.17.18

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.