Summary: | [815] Max resolution of 800x600 (unrecognized monitor) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Bryce Harrington <bryce> | ||||||
Component: | Driver/intel | Assignee: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||
Severity: | major | ||||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | robert.pogson, tkennedy3 | ||||||
Version: | 7.4 (2008.09) | ||||||||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bryce Harrington
2009-07-10 01:00:27 UTC
Created attachment 27544 [details]
Xorg.0.log - bad, Karmic Alpha 2
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 01:00:30 -0700, bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org wrote: > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Standardbildschirm" > Option "DPMS" > HorizSync 28-64 > VertRefresh 43-60 > EndSection > the xorg.conf in karmic doesn't have that, so it uses the default sync ranges, and the 1280x1024 modes get rejected. Given that DDC fails, I'm not sure there's much more the driver can do here. I encountered this behaviour in the released version of Karmic Koala, Ubuntu 9.10. I installed in a VirtualBox VM and no monitor could be seen. The Vesa driver defaults limited resolution to 800x600. I had to supply an xorg.conf with sweep frequencies, not a good feature of a popular distro recommended for newbies. Can the default sweep frequencies be raised to include the more often used 1024x768? w3schools reports that only 3% of humanity use 800x600 while most use higher than 1024x768. This issue is affecting a hardware component which is not being actively worked on anymore. Moving the assignee to the dri-devel list as contact, to give this issue a better coverage. No one is in a position to fix these bugs and with the removal of xaa it matters not. When an intrepid hw/sw archaeologist turns up, he will have plenty of fun on his hands rebuilding from scratch... |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.