Summary: | Intel KMS ignores some TV resolutions (SHP 31) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | unggnu |
Component: | Driver/intel | Assignee: | ykzhao <yakui.zhao> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.4 (2008.09) | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435241 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
unggnu
2009-09-23 06:37:11 UTC
what does "SHP 31" mean? SHP 31 is the monitor name which is shown in the screen resolution utility and I guess xrandr. Not really important though if it is not hardware specific. Will you please try Dave's drm-next tree and see whether the issue still exists? Please use the following command to switch to the Dave's drm-next tree. 1. git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git 2. git branch -r 3. git checkout -b origin/drm-next In fact the issue in this bug is that the standard mode(1280x720@60Hz) in EDID is missing. And it should be fixed by the following commit: commit 5c61259e6c7290082108e93815f7f72f27da14f4 Author: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Date: Mon Jun 22 13:17:10 2009 +0800 drm/mode: get the modeline for standard timing in EDID by using CVT/GTF Thanks. Thanks for your reply. I would like to test it but atm I couldn't directly access the system. Compiling is no real option for the owner so is there already a package/kernel with this commit? I don't want to mess with self backed drm through remote control if possible. (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for your reply. > I would like to test it but atm I couldn't directly access the system. > Compiling is no real option for the owner so is there already a package/kernel > with this commit? I don't want to mess with self backed drm through remote > control if possible. > The linux-2.6.32-rc1 is also ok. You can try it. Thanks. It works fine with 2.6.32-rc1 so I suppose your fix works. Many thanks. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.