Summary: | tinymail as a freedesktop.org project | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | freedesktop.org | Reporter: | Sergio Villar Senin <svillar> |
Component: | Project Creation Requests | Assignee: | fd.o Admin Massive <sitewranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Sergio Villar Senin
2009-10-15 02:24:22 UTC
As maintainer of this project I'm ok with Sergio's (co-maintainer) proposal. Hi guys, almost 2 weeks since I filed the proposal. Can you give us at least some feedback, like it's under study or something? Thx! What infrustructure would you be after at fd.o? (In reply to comment #3) > What infrustructure would you be after at fd.o? > We'd like to move everything possible to f.d.o, this means (In reply to comment #3) > What infrustructure would you be after at fd.o? > We'd like to move everything possible to f.d.o, this means * git repo * bugzilla * mailing list * project page (like http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus) were to put project information, documentation, packages... (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > What infrustructure would you be after at fd.o? > > > > We'd like to move everything possible to f.d.o, this means > > * git repo > * bugzilla > * mailing list > * project page (like http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus) were to > put project information, documentation, packages... > BTW we have moved the git repository to gitorious.org so we wouldn't need it from f.d.o Short answer: No, sorry, I don't think tinymail is appropriate for fdo. Tinymail seems more geared towards mobile than desktops, while fdo is targetting desktops more than mobile. Also, I'm not sure in what way Tinymail helps ensuring a world of X desktop interoperability. Good luck forward, though. (In reply to comment #7) > Short answer: No, sorry, I don't think tinymail is appropriate for fdo. > > Tinymail seems more geared towards mobile than desktops, while fdo is > targetting desktops more than mobile. Also, I'm not sure in what way Tinymail > helps ensuring a world of X desktop interoperability. Good luck forward, > though. I have to completely disagree with that :-). We're only *emphasizing* its use for mobile devices because we focused a lot on memory saving and performance in general, but tinymail can be used in any kind of desktop. I'd like to know the rationale behind the idea that tinymail does not target desktops because if you take a look at the code there is none. Actually most of the code of tinymail comes from Camel, the email library used by evolution, one of the most used email clients for desktops and not mobiles. Regarding interoperability, tinymail is designed in a way it does not depend on any desktop in particular, its only heavy dependency is glib. Having an desktop-independent email library looks like something desirable IMHO. Again taking a look at the code, tinymail has been successfully used in GNOME, Maemo, Moblin, Sugar(OLPC). At least I don't see the difference with other f.d.o software like libburn, exempi or geoclue. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.