| Summary: | Incorporate Gabble's decloaking API or something similar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Telepathy | Reporter: | Simon McVittie <smcv> |
| Component: | tp-spec | Assignee: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | git master | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 70382 | ||
| Attachments: | remove Decloak extension | ||
|
Description
Simon McVittie
2010-01-22 08:21:48 UTC
Attachment #87475 [details] pulls Decloak1 into tp-spec. I wrote: > Not sure whether to merge this one or not... it's pretty XMPP-specific, but > then, Conn.I.Cellular is protocol-specific and we still spec'd that one > centrally. Guillaume replied: > I'm not sure either about this one. Is it actually used these days? The answer to that is: Call1 never did the "automatic decloak attempt" that StreamedMedia did, and we've removed StreamedMedia now, so Decloak won't be used automatically. It'll only be used if someone uses the D-Bus API to ask for it specifically. Also, xmpp.org changed the namespace from "temppres" back to "decloak", so we're no longer XEP-draft-compliant (although in any case the namespace isn't official until the XEP progresses to draft). I'd be OK with removing this functionality and putting it back later if there's actually demand, tbh. Created attachment 93354 [details] [review] remove Decloak extension Comment on attachment 93354 [details] [review] remove Decloak extension Review of attachment 93354 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Merged to next. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.