| Summary: | OML_sync_control broken with older DRI2 servers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzilla> |
| Component: | GLX | Assignee: | Jesse Barnes <jbarnes> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | ghepeu, jbarnes, pedretti.fabio, pierre-bugzilla |
| Version: | git | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
| Attachments: | only enable OML if server supports it | ||
|
Description
Pierre Ossman
2010-01-26 03:44:56 UTC
Adding Jesse Barnes as cc as he made the relevant change. I'll check it out. What did these routines return on old servers? I'll try to preserve the same behavior... I'm afraid I haven't analyzed it deeply. I just noticed that xbmc no longer vsynced, and I bisected it to that commit. (I also checked xbmc's code and confirmed it uses that extension) I'll take a look... Any news on this? No sorry, been working on other bugs. I'll get to it eventually. Looking at the Mesa code it seems like it should do the right thing with old servers... Pulling down the xbmc code now to see how they use OML. Created attachment 33772 [details] [review] only enable OML if server supports it Not sure why we were enabling it unconditionally before, but this seems to fix my test case at least. We'll need to get this into Mesa 7.8 to avoid breaking things. I'm not sure I follow here. If it was always turned on previously, but didn't work properly without a recent DRI2 X server, how does this improve things? It was turned on before but would only work correctly in specific cases. So this patch disables it when we can't guarantee it will work, but enables it if we can. Apps check for extensions anyway, so it should be safe and fix the issue with XMBC, and make the 7.8 release a bit more honest. Oh btw, I think old Mesa exposed the OML extension but didn't actually bother to provide the synchronization guarantees it specs, so we were advertising it falsely. This patch fixes that. Hm, my test program was wrong. Before the commit I just pushed I don't think we'd ever advertise OML_sync_control as a supported GLX extension. It would be in the client extension string, indicating that Mesa *could* support it with server or direct support, but we never enabled either until now. So maybe XBMC is buggy and is trying to use the OML funcs w/o checking first? What does glxinfo report for you in the broken and working cases? (sorry for the late reply)
This is glxinfo when working (everything at 833acea, except src/glx which is at cca66db):
# glxinfo | grep OML
GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGI_swap_control,
GLX_MESA_swap_frame_usage, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_OML_sync_control,
GLX_MESA_swap_frame_usage, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read,
Unfortunately, it seems I cannot make things break anymore. My X server has been updated to 1.7.5.901, and I guess that version supports the new DRI2 stuff.
I think this one is fixed now. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.