Summary: | Xserver hangs in an infinite loop | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Pavel S. <pav_s> | ||||||||||
Component: | Driver/nouveau | Assignee: | Nouveau Project <nouveau> | ||||||||||
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||||||
Severity: | major | ||||||||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | mcepl, picogeyer | ||||||||||
Version: | git | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||||||||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Pavel S.
2010-05-30 04:06:56 UTC
Created attachment 35950 [details]
dmesg - nothing special here
Created attachment 35951 [details]
[mi] overflowing...
Created attachment 35953 [details]
dmesg - this looks pomising...
After killing the server I get some messages in the dmesg, maybe this helps...
Created attachment 36145 [details]
Gdb backtrace of Xorg
I think I'm having exactly the same issue.
Would this backtrace of Xorg help?
That " [mi] EQ overflowing" message is completely meaningless. Please, read http://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=124101535025331&w=2 and then take a look at the disaster which happens when people start to file this message as a bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465884. Much more interesting is this backtrace: Backtrace: [ 5443.624] 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x28) [0x46c3c8] [ 5443.624] 1: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x1eb) [0x45b21b] [ 5443.624] 2: /usr/bin/X (xf86PostMotionEventP+0xc8) [0x472828] [ 5443.624] 3: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so (0x7f29c6ccc000+0x407f) [0x7f29c6cd007f] [ 5443.625] 4: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x6f6d7) [0x46f6d7] [ 5443.625] 5: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0xf647a) [0x4f647a] [ 5443.625] 6: /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f29ca790000+0xedf0) [0x7f29ca79edf0] [ 5443.625] 7: /lib/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x7) [0x7f29c8f0bf17] [ 5443.625] 8: /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (drmIoctl+0x23) [0x7f29c881eeb3] [ 5443.625] 9: /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (drmCommandWrite+0x1b) [0x7f29c881f13b] [ 5443.625] 10: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (0x7f29c7741000+0x31ed) [0x7f29c77441ed] [ 5443.625] 11: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (nouveau_bo_map_range+0xff) [0x7f29c774439f] [ 5443.625] 12: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0x7f29c7947000+0x5f5d) [0x7f29c794cf5d] [ 5443.625] 13: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libexa.so (0x7f29c70de000+0x4637) [0x7f29c70e2637] [ 5443.625] 14: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libexa.so (0x7f29c70de000+0x74d2) [0x7f29c70e54d2] [ 5443.625] 15: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libexa.so (0x7f29c70de000+0x4817) [0x7f29c70e2817] [ 5443.625] 16: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0xb6a3a) [0x4b6a3a] [ 5443.625] 17: /usr/bin/X (ValidateGC+0x24) [0x447b54] [ 5443.625] 18: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x14758b) [0x54758b] [ 5443.625] 19: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x1476b0) [0x5476b0] [ 5443.625] 20: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x149d33) [0x549d33] [ 5443.625] 21: /usr/bin/X (ConfigureWindow+0xb22) [0x42a302] [ 5443.625] 22: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x378d7) [0x4378d7] [ 5443.625] 23: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x3830c) [0x43830c] [ 5443.625] 24: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x24de5) [0x424de5] [ 5443.625] 25: /lib/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7f29c8e61a26] [ 5443.625] 26: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x24999) [0x424999] Looks like a crash in libdrm (or maybe nouveau driver) to me. (In reply to comment #5) > That " [mi] EQ overflowing" message is completely meaningless. Please, read > http://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=124101535025331&w=2 and then take a > look at the disaster which happens when people start to file this message as a > bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465884. Yes, I knew this, that ist why I looked into the GDB where the server was hanging. I am not experienced with X debugging to understand this bug though, so I decided to ask here. > Much more interesting is this backtrace: It looks to me that the server causes an deadlock in the kernel, and after that it hopelessly hangs in that tight loop trying to get a response from the kernel.... |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.