| Summary: |
demarshaller: Don't need extra data_size members for chunked data. |
| Product: |
Spice
|
Reporter: |
Alexander Larsson <alexl> |
| Component: |
spicec (deprecated) | Assignee: |
Spice Bug List <spice-bugs> |
| Status: |
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
|
QA Contact: |
|
| Severity: |
normal
|
|
|
| Priority: |
medium
|
|
|
| Version: |
unspecified | |
|
| Hardware: |
Other | |
|
| OS: |
All | |
|
| Whiteboard: |
|
|
i915 platform:
|
|
i915 features:
|
|
|---|
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Take for example: typedef struct SpiceQUICData { uint32_t data_size; SpiceChunks *data; } With the protocol description: struct BinaryData { uint32 data_size; uint8 data[data_size] @nomarshal @chunk; } @ctype(SpiceQUICData); Since SpiceChunks* already contains the data size we should not need to store it separately in SpiceQUICData. However, this needs some work in the codegeneration to work.