Summary: | Please backport r200 fix to r100 and r300c | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | Fabio Pedretti <pedretti.fabio> |
Component: | Drivers/DRI/R100 | Assignee: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | neowall |
Version: | git | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Fabio Pedretti
2010-10-27 00:50:17 UTC
Done for r100: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=b194b9b23801cd716244047b0b9b8bd9be518b78 I'm not sure if r300c/r600c need a similar fix or not. I can say that r300c is still crashing when resizing glxgears: drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22. Kernel failed to parse or rejected command stream. See dmesg for more info. [ 3429.186630] [drm:r100_cs_track_check] *ERROR* [drm] Buffer too small for z buffer (need 1053440 have 389120) ! [ 3429.186642] [drm:r100_cs_track_check] *ERROR* [drm] zbuffer (320 4 0 823) [ 3429.186647] [drm:radeon_cs_ioctl] *ERROR* Invalid command stream ! Alex, I'm also still getting this error on Radeon X1650. $ lspci -nn | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc RV535 [Radeon X1650 Series] [1002:71c7] (rev 9e) Running glxgears and resizing produces: drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22. Kernel failed to parse or rejected command stream. See dmesg for more info. $ dmesg | tail [ 255.016584] [drm:r100_cs_track_check] *ERROR* [drm] Buffer too small for z buffer (need 612864 have 516096) ! [ 255.016594] [drm:r100_cs_track_check] *ERROR* [drm] zbuffer (384 4 0 399) [ 255.016597] [drm:radeon_cs_ioctl] *ERROR* Invalid command stream ! $ uname -a Linux 2.6.36-020636rc6-generic #201009291126 SMP Wed Sep 29 12:42:36 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Is there an estimate for when this might happen? Thank you! Looks like r300c was fixed by the following commit: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=d8eef5196fcd6f51e443d4dfa0fda8aadc668f9f I guess we can close this then. Which kernel is this going to get merged into? Could I figure this out from the ticket? Thanks everybody! (In reply to comment #7) > Which kernel is this going to get merged into? Could I figure this out from the > ticket? These are mesa fixes, not kernel fixes. They are in mesa master and the 7.9 branch so they'll show up in mesa 7.10 and 7.9.1. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.