| Summary: | Book is GFDL-1.1+ but COPYING is GFDL-1.2+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Telepathy | Reporter: | Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu27> |
| Component: | tp-doc | Assignee: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | danielle |
| Version: | git master | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
|
Description
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
2010-12-29 08:02:38 UTC
Why is this under the GFDL anyway? Licensing things under the GFDL is a pain because you can't copy between GFDL and (L)GPL code. My inclination would be to put tp-book under our normal license (LGPL-2.1+), or possibly a GFDL-1.1+/LGPL-2.1+ dual-license if people feel strongly about any additional permissions granted by the GFDL (if I remember correctly, it has some unconventional terms to make it easier to publish in dead-tree format). If we want to relicense, the sooner the better, while it has as few copyright holders as possible. Is it still purely © Collabora? -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/telepathy/telepathy-doc/issues/7. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.