Summary: | Force symbolic link creation during installation of systemd files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | dbus | Reporter: | guido |
Component: | core | Assignee: | Simon McVittie <smcv> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | John (J5) Palmieri <johnp> |
Severity: | trivial | ||
Priority: | low | CC: | hp, lennart, smcv, will |
Version: | 1.4.x | Keywords: | patch |
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~smcv/dbus/log/?h=ln-sf-37870 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 36074 | ||
Attachments: |
bus: use ln -fs to enable dbus in systemd, not $(LN_S)
Initial patch - do not apply as is without further checking validity |
Description
guido
2011-06-02 18:02:02 UTC
Most people install dbus via a ${DESTDIR} (as used in the preparation of RPM/dpkg packages) so this failure mode hadn't been seen before. Here's a patch. Created attachment 47659 [details] [review] bus: use ln -fs to enable dbus in systemd, not $(LN_S) Using $(LN_S) is inappropriate because it could in theory mean either ln -s, ln or cp -p depending on autoconf checks. Not using -f breaks reinstallation directly from source (DESTDIR unset), because the symlinks will already exist. Because systemd isn't currently portable to non-Linux, let alone non-SUS-compliant systems, it seems safe to assume that ln -fs behaves as specified by SUS if systemd was found. Review of attachment 47659 [details] [review]: Looks fine. Thanks very much guys. We shall not forget that apparently "Solaris /bin/ln does not understand -f" (see for example ltmain.sh:3009). I will now check and try to review the patch and report back in a few minutes. Patch not effective apparently... It seems to me that: - all Makefile.in have not been tackled; - top-level configure has not been tackled; - libtool.m4 ? - please do not forget Solaris' special case. Created attachment 47675 [details] [review] Initial patch - do not apply as is without further checking validity Initial patch - do not apply as is without further checking validity At least it needs to be modified in order to account for Solaris' special case (ln -sf not understood). (In reply to comment #4) > We shall not forget that apparently "Solaris /bin/ln does not understand -f" systemd doesn't support Solaris and probably never will, so if we have systemd, we can't be on Solaris. (In reply to comment #5) > It seems to me that: > - all Makefile.in have not been tackled; > - top-level configure has not been tackled; > - libtool.m4 ? The various Makefile.in are generated by automake from Makefile.am, configure is generated by autoconf from configure.ac, and libtool.m4 is copied in by libtoolize. To make my patch effective, you need to apply it then run "autoreconf" in the top level directory. Please see autoconf, automake, libtool documentation for details of what generates what. In general it is not a bug for LN_S to be defined to "ln -s" - the uses of LN_S in bus/Makefile.am were wrong, because they wanted "ln -sf" semantics, but the uses of LN_S elsewhere should be fine. Review of attachment 47675 [details] [review]: Every file patched here, except Makefile.am, is generated from something else. If developing patches in future, please use what's in the git repository as a basis for patching - the git repository does not contain any generated files, only the "real source", whereas the tarball releases also contain files generated by autoconf and automake. (In reply to comment #3) > Review of attachment 47659 [details] [review]: > > Looks fine. Applied in git for 1.4.12, 1.5.4. Guido, if you're still having trouble applying the patch, you could try one of these snapshot tarballs (depending whether you're following releases of dbus-1.4 or master), which have it pre-applied and the autotools stuff re-generated: http://people.collabora.co.uk/~smcv/expires-201107/dbus-1.4.11-37870.tar.gz http://people.collabora.co.uk/~smcv/expires-201107/dbus-1.5.3-37870.tar.gz Yes, you're right Simon. I had done autoconf instead of autoreconf.... And clearly I didn't know the case for Solaris as I am not using it and I've never used it, but thanks for pointing that out. Everything sorted now. Cheers |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.