| Summary: | rtp: Set proper latency values on pulsesink/pulsesrc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Farstream | Reporter: | Arun Raghavan <arun> |
| Component: | RTP Plugin | Assignee: | Olivier Crête <olivier.crete> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
| Attachments: |
0001-rtp-Set-proper-latency-values-on-pulsesink-pulsesrc.patch
rtp: Tune pulsesink/pulsesrc latency values further |
||
|
Description
Arun Raghavan
2011-11-01 01:43:20 UTC
Committed. Don't worry too much about performance, on the N900, we have buffer-time at 40ms. And anyway, the default thing is for PC-class hardware. As I expect we will continue to have custom properties for embedded hardware for the foreseeable future. Reopening -- the values I submitted were bad and would result in a couple of seconds of scratchiness at the beginning of a call on some hardware. This should be more sensible. Created attachment 53746 [details] [review] rtp: Tune pulsesink/pulsesrc latency values further Patch applied! I end up putting latency-time to 20ms instead of 10ms because it halves the per-buffer CPU usage.. [pulsesink] buffer-time=40000 latency-time=20000 [pulsesrc] buffer-time=20000 commit 5bdb476dfe467c129cb2e50fc7bf120df7babfdd Author: Arun Raghavan <arun.raghavan@collabora.co.uk> Date: Fri Mar 22 15:09:29 2013 -0400 rtp: Tune pulsesink/pulsesrc latency values further This makes for lower overall values without forcing a bunch of underruns at the start which we got by having pulsesink's buffer-time as 2*latency-time. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.